Oklahoma PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers

The PPP application wasn’t just paperwork requesting emergency relief during a pandemic. It was a sworn legal document where you certified facts “under penalty of perjury.” Every number you entered – employee count, payroll expenses, revenue figures – became a prosecutable false statement if incorrect. The government designed it this way. By clicking “I certify,” you created documentary evidence for your own federal prosecution.

And here’s what nobody told you: loan forgiveness is a CIVIL process reviewing whether you used the money correctly. Criminal prosecution is a SEPARATE FEDERAL INVESTIGATION reviewing whether you lied to get it. The SBA can forgive your loan while the DOJ indicts you. Different question. Different agency. Different outcome. At Spodek Law Group, we represent clients facing PPP loan fraud investigations across Oklahoma – Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Norman, and statewide. Our mission is to provide clear, honest guidance when you’re dealing with federal criminal exposure you didn’t see coming. Call 212-300-5196.

The forgiveness letter you received doesn’t mean you’re in the clear. This means the SBA has determined that you used the funds for eligible expenses. It says nothing about whether you lied to obtain them. That’s a different legal question, handled by other federal agencies, under other laws. And the prosecutions are underway in Oklahoma.

You Signed a Legal Confession When You Applied for PPP Relief

You remember the application. How many employees do you have? What was your average monthly payroll in 2019? What’s your business revenue? You filled out the numbers, you checked the boxes, you clicked submit. Emergency relief during an economic crisis. The government was handing out money to keep businesses afloat. You applied like millions of others.

But look at the certification language you signed. “I certify that the information provided in this application and the information provided in all supporting documents and forms is true and accurate in all material respects. I understand that knowingly making a false statement to obtain a guaranteed loan from SBA is punishable under the law, including under 18 USC 1001 and 3571 by imprisonment of not more than five years and/or a fine of up to $250,000.”

You signed that under penalty of perjury. That means if any number you entered was wrong – if you inflated your payroll, if you overstated employee count, if you claimed expenses that didn’t exist – you didn’t just make a mistake on a government form. You committed a federal crime. And you documented it yourself. No wiretaps needed. No undercover agents. No surveillance. You wrote your own indictment and submitted it electronically with a timestamp.

Defense attorneys call this the “certification trap.” Prosecutors don’t need to prove you intended fraud through circumstantial evidence. You signed a legal document under oath. What you certified was false. The government gave you money based on that false certification. Thats the crime. The documentary evidence is the application itself. Your signature. Your submission.

And here’wherere it gets worse. Courts are rejecting the defenses you think you have. “My accountant told me I qualified.” Judges respond: “You signed under penalty of perjury. The law required YOU to verify the truth. Your accountants advice is irrelevant.” The duty to verify was yours the moment you clicked that certification box. Reliance on professional advice has been rejected in nearly every PPP fraud case that’s gone to trial.

This is different then other federal fraud prosecutions. In securities fraud, in healthcare fraud, in tax fraud – prosecutors have to prove you intended to deceive, that you knowingly made false representations. Thats hard. It requires witness testimony, documentary trails, proof of intent. But in PPP fraud, you gave them intent when you signed under penalty of perjury. You certified you knew the information was accurate. If it wasn’t, the intent is presumed.

The application was designed this way. The “under penalty of perjury” language wasn’t accidental. It was a prosecutorial tool built into emergency relief. When you applied for help, you were actually creating evidence. And the government kept all of it.

By the Time You Found Out About the Investigation, It Had Been Running for Months

Most people dont find out there under investigation from a formal letter. They find out through a panicked phone call. A former employee says FBI agents just showed up asking questions. An accountant says federal investigators requested documents. A business partner got subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury.

By the time you get that call, the investigation has been running for months. The FBI already has your bank records. The IRS Criminal Investigation division already pulled your tax returns. Federal agents already interviewed witnesses. Those witnesses werent represented by counsel. They talked. All of it documented in FBI 302 reports that will be used against you.

An algorithm flags your PPP loan. Someone calls the fraud hotline. A bank files a Suspicious Activity Report. The case gets assigned to FBI, IRS-CI, or SBA-OIG. They pull your application, bank records, tax returns, payroll records. They build timelines. Chart money flows. Document every car purchase, vacation, personal expense. Anything inconsistent with your application – there documenting it.

Then they interview witnesses. Show up at peoples homes. “Were investigating PPP loans.” The person panics, thinks cooperating helps, answers questions. Sometimes they say things that arent true because there scared. The FBI writes it all down. Those statements become evidence.

This process takes 12 to 24 months. The entire time, you dont know its happening. Your going about your life. The forgiveness letter came. Your in the clear.

Then you get the call. Or FBI agents show up. Or you receive a target letter. And you realize the investigation has been running without you knowing.

By that point, its almost too late. The prosecutors case is built. They have documentary evidence, witness statements, expert analysis. There not reaching out because there starting the investigation. There reaching out because there finishing it. The call is not the beginning. Its the end.

And this is were people make catastrophic mistakes. They think they can explain it to the FBI. So they talk without a lawyer. They make inconsistent statements. They misremember details under pressure. They contradict what a witness already said.

Now the prosecutor has another charge: 18 USC 1001, making false statements to federal agents. Up to 5 years. You just added 5 years to your potential sentence by trying to cooperate. The original PPP fraud charge carried 20 years for wire fraud. Now its 25.

Defense attorneys tell clients: Do not talk to federal agents without your attorney present. Ever. Even if you think your innocent. Even if you think you can clear this up. The agents arent there to clear anything up. There there to gather evidence for prosecution. Anything you say will be used against you. Nothing you say will help you.

But by the time most people call a lawyer, theyve already talked. Theyve already made the mistakes that destroy there defense.

Every Defense You Think You Have Isn’t Going to Work

“My accountant told me I qualified.” Courts have rejected this defense in nearly every PPP fraud case. Judges say: You signed the application under penalty of perjury. The certification required YOU to verify the accuracy of the information. What your accountant told you is irrelevant. You had a legal duty to ensure the information was correct. If you relied on someone elses advice without verifying it yourself, that doesnt excuse the false certification.

The reliance-on-advisor defense works in some areas of federal law. Tax fraud, sometimes. Securities fraud, occasionally. But in PPP fraud, the certification language kills it. You didnt just submit information. You swore under penalty of perjury that it was accurate. The court reads that as: You verified it. You knew it. If you didnt actually verify it, you committed perjury. Either way, your guilty.

“I made an honest mistake.” Prosecutors counter: Then why didnt you use the safe harbor period. In May 2020, the SBA announced a safe harbor provision. If you recieved a PPP loan and then determined you didnt actually qualify, you could return the funds by May 18, 2020. No questions asked. No penalties. No prosecution. The government gave you an out.

If you had good-faith doubts about whether you qualified, you had a clear opportunity to return the money. The fact that you kept it proves you either believed you qualified – which means you knowingly submitted false information – or you knew you didnt qualify but wanted to keep the money anyway – which means you committed intentional fraud. Either way, the safe harbor period is now used AGAINST you. Prosecutors argue: The safe harbor proves you didnt have honest doubts. You kept the money. That proves intent.

“It was only $30,000. There going after the big fish, not me.” Wrong. In Oklahoma, Brian Foster pleaded guilty to PPP fraud for a $20,833 loan. Federal conviction. Criminal record. There is no floor. There is no amount too small to prosecute. Prosecutors are bringing cases on loans under $50,000. Under $25,000. If the evidence is there, there prosecuting.

The idea that “small loans dont get prosecuted” is a myth that destroys people. They think there safe because the loan was only $40,000 or $60,000. Then they get indicted. Then they realize the prosecution doesnt care about the amount. They care about the false statement. You lied on a federal document. You certified it under penalty of perjury. The amount is just the loss calculation for sentencing. The crime is the lie.

“I cooperated with the SBA audit. That shows good faith.” No. It shows you handed prosecutors evidence. The SBA shares audit findings with the DOJ through “Access Requests.” Your cooperation with the SBA audit – the documents you provided, the explanations you gave, the statements you made – all of that gets shared with federal prosecutors. Your civil cooperation becomes criminal evidence.

The SBA audit is not separate from the criminal investigation. Its part of it. The auditor identifies discrepancies. Refers the case to the SBA Office of Inspector General. The OIG investigates. Refers to DOJ. DOJ opens a criminal case. Everything you said to the auditor is now in the prosecutors file. You thought you were showing good faith. You were actually building the governments case.

of criminal cases in NJ are resolved through plea agreements

of criminal charges are dismissed or reduced with proper legal representation

Source: NJ Courts Annual Report

Statistics updated regularly based on latest available data

Saying 'my accountant told me to do it' isn't automatic protection. You need documentation of the advice AND proof you followed it exactly as given.

Returning items you didn't buy, using fake receipts, or 'wardrobing' (wearing and returning) isn't a minor issue – it's felony theft with serious consequences.

“Ill just pay the money back now.” Repayment doesnt make the charges go away. It can help at sentencing – judges consider restitution when determining sentence length. But repayment is also evidence of guilt. Prosecutors argue: Why would you pay back money you legitimately qualified for. The repayment shows consciousness of wrongdoing. You knew you didnt qualify. Thats why your paying it back.

Paying back the loan after you receive a target letter or after agents contact you is too late to avoid prosecution. It might reduce your sentence. But your still facing charges. The crime was the false certification, not the failure to repay. Repaying doesnt undo the certification.

These defenses sound logical. They sound like they should work. But in PPP fraud prosecutions, there failing. Courts are rejecting them. Prosecutors are countering them. And defendants who relied on these defenses are going to federal prison.

What Is the Penalty for Lying on a PPP Loan Application?

Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Mail Fraud (18 USC 1341)

Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Bank Fraud (18 USC 1344)

Federal SBA Disaster Loan Fraud Beyond PPP

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

"Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive…"

Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive and knowledgeable about my matter. He was available when needed to discuss things. Definitely recommend him to any and everyone!