NJ PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers

You think PPP fraud is over because COVID ended years ago. The federal government has been building cases this whole time. They subpoenaed bank records from JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and every other major lender – without notifying the borrowers. The 10-year statute of limitations means prosecutors can charge you until 2030 or 2031. By the time you find out you’re under investigation – a target letter, an FBI business card tucked in your door, a strange call from your bank – they’ve already built their case against you. You’re the last to know.

Welcome to Spodek Law Group. Our goal is to give you real information about PPP loan fraud defense in New Jersey – the kind of information that other law firm websites won’t tell you because it’s uncomfortable. Todd Spodek has represented clients facing federal fraud charges across the country, and the single most important thing we’ve learned is this: the conventional wisdom about PPP fraud is catastrophically wrong. The advice that worked in 2021 – pay it back quietly and move on – now guarantees prosecution in 2025. Understanding why requires understanding how federal investigators actually work.

Here’s what the federal government figured out about PPP fraud. Every single application went through digital systems. Every bank record exists in searchable databases. Every suspicious activity report filed by your lender went straight to federal investigators. The evidence isn’t scattered across filing cabinets – it’s already compiled, indexed, and waiting. The only question is whether prosecutors have gotten to your file yet. With the dedicated COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Strike Force operating in the District of New Jersey, they’re getting to more files every month.

The Investigation That Already Happened

Heres the thing nobody tells you about PPP fraud investigations. The investigation probly started years ago. You just didnt know about it. The Department of Justice sent grand jury subpoenas to major banks starting in 2021. Those banks turned over customer records – your records – without any legal obligation to notify you. Your bank statements, wire transfers, deposits, withdrawals, loan applications – all of it went to federal investigators while you were going about your daily life thinking you got away with something.

Think about what this means. The government dosent need to investigate you in the traditional sense. They dont need to follow you around or interview your neighbors. They already have everything. Your PPP application with the employee counts you certified under penalty of perjury. Your bank records showing exactly were the money went. Your tax filings that either match your application or dont. The investigation happened in a government office somewhere, with analysts comparing documents you submitted to documents your bank provided. You were never part of that conversation.

The District of New Jersey operates one of five COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Strike Forces in the country. These arnt part-time efforts. There dedicated task forces with prosecutors, FBI agents, IRS Criminal Investigation agents, and SBA Office of Inspector General investigators all working together. The strike force focuses on large-scale pandemic fraud, and “large-scale” in New Jersey means anything over about $150,000. If your PPP loan was above that threshold, your file is almost certianly in someone’s queue.

And heres how the evidence trail actualy works. Your bank filed a Suspicious Activity Report – a SAR – the moment your PPP loan triggered there automated fraud detection systems. Maybe the employee count didnt match your payroll history. Maybe the funds moved to personal accounts to quickly. Maybe the business was to new or the revenue numbers didnt add up. Whatever triggered it, that SAR went directly to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. From there, it went to the SBA Office of Inspector General. From there, it got referred to the FBI or IRS Criminal Investigation. This entire chain of events happened without your knowledge. You found out about none of it. The investigation was running before you had any idea there was a problem.

Heres the part that realy matters. By the time you receive any indication your under investigation – any indication at all – the government has already built a substantial portion of there case. The target letter isnt the begining of there investigation. Its closer to the end. There telling you about the investigation becuase there ready to charge you, and they want to see if youll cooperate or if youll make mistakes that give them more evidence.

The Charges That Stack – Understanding Federal PPP Fraud Exposure

Heres the math that changes everything. PPP fraud isnt one charge. Its multiple charges that stack on top of each other:

• Each fraudulent application is a seperate count of bank fraud under 18 USC 1344
• Each wire transfer of fraudulent proceeds is a seperate count of wire fraud under 18 USC 1343
• Each false statement on your application is a seperate violation
• Money laundering charges if you moved the funds around

Bank fraud carries up to 30 years in federal prison per count. Wire fraud carries up to 20 years per count. If you submitted multiple PPP applications – what prosecutors call “loan stacking” – each application multiplies your exposure. Three fraudulent applications isnt three times worse then one application. Its potentialy three times 30 years. The federal sentencing guidelines reduce this in practice, but the theoretical exposure is staggering.

And heres the paradox that traps people. You signed certifications under penalty of perjury. The PPP application made you certify that the information was accurate. So the “I was confused” defense requires proving that you lied about lying. You have to argue that when you certified the application was accurate, you didnt know it was inaccurate – even though the certifcation was the mechanism that made your submission binding. Its a logical trap that dosent have an easy exit.

The informal prosecution threshold is around $150,000. Below that amount, cases often get resolved civily – you pay back the money plus penalties, no criminal charges. But above $150,000, you enter the zone were federal prosecutors will seriousley consider bringing criminal charges. Above $500,000, prosecution is almost certian if fraud can be proven. These are rough guidelines, not rules. Aggrivating factors like identity theft, multiple applications, or lavish spending can trigger prosecution at any amount.

And theres another layer that most people dont understand. The false forgiveness application trap. Many people submitted one questionable PPP application – thats bad enough. But then they compounded it by submitting a forgiveness application that repeated the same false information. Now you have two federal crimes. The orignal fraud and the follow-up fraud. Each one is a seperate offense. Each one carries its own penalties. The forgiveness application wasnt a way to close the loop on a problematic loan. It was a second fraudulent submission that doubled your legal exposure. If you submitted forgiveness paperwork for a loan you knew was problematic, you didnt make things better. You made them significantly worse.

What Happened to Real People in New Jersey

Lets talk about actual cases becuase the numbers are abstract untill you see what happens to real people. Daniel Dadoun was a business owner from South Plainfield, New Jersey. He obtained PPP loans totaling over $3.2 million using false documents and misrepresentations. After recieving the funds, he submitted false loan forgiveness applications with fake tax documents and altered bank statements. He was sentenced to 41 months in federal prison and ordered to pay back every dollar.

Tommy Hawkins was a branch manager at a national bank. He used his position to help people obtain fraudulent PPP loans – 38 of them, totaling about $5 million. He took $5,000 from each loan as his cut. He thought his insider position protected him. It didnt. He was sentenced to 65 months in federal prison. His bank job, his career, his freedom – all gone.

A Union County man who prosecutors didnt even name in the press release – to protect his family’s privacy, probly – was sentenced to 24 months for a $900,000 PPP fraud scheme. Thats two years of his life. Malak Faltawws from Bergen County, also known as Mark Andrews, pled guilty in June 2025 for a $600,000 COVID fraud scheme. His sentencing is still pending. These arnt abstract statistics. There people from your comunity who made the same calculation you might be making.

At Spodek Law Group, weve seen this pattern constantaly. Clients come to us after the target letter arrives, after the FBI shows up, after there bank starts asking wierd questions. By then, the governments case is already built. The window to negotiate, to present your side, to potentialy avoid charges – that window is smaller then you think. And it closes fast.

defendants enrolled in NJ pretrial intervention programs annually

reduction in pretrial jail population since NJ bail reform

Statistics updated regularly based on latest available data

Saying 'my accountant told me to do it' isn't automatic protection. You need documentation of the advice AND proof you followed it exactly as given.

Returning items you didn't buy, using fake receipts, or 'wardrobing' (wearing and returning) isn't a minor issue – it's felony theft with serious consequences.

Heres what these cases have in common. Every single defendant thought they wouldnt get caught. Dadoun had a legitimate business – he thought the fraud would blend in. Hawkins worked at the bank – he thought his insider knowledge protected him. The Union County defendant kept his name out of the papers – but he still went to prison. The pattern is always the same. People think there situation is differant. They think there too small to notice, or too connected to prosecute, or too far removed from the loan to be held responsible. The federal government dosent care about any of that. They have the documents. They have the bank records. They have years to bring charges. And they are working through there list methodicaly, one case at a time.

Warning Signs You’re Already Under Investigation

Heres how you find out your under federal investigation for PPP fraud:

Option one: you recieve a target letter from the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey. The letter says your a “target” of a federal grand jury investigation. It invites you to testify. It sounds almost polite. Dont be fooled. If that letter says “target,” the government already has evidence – bank records showing your loan deposits, your PPP application with the numbers you certified, witness statements from your accountant or employees or business partners. Theyve been investigating for months before you recieved this letter.

Option two: an FBI agent or IRS Criminal Investigation agent leaves a business card at your home or office. The card asks you to call. Your instinct is to call back and explain – to clear things up. Do not call them without an attorney. Everything you say will be recorded. Everything you say can and will be used against you. The agents arnt there to help you. Theyre there to gather more evidence.

Option three: your bank calls with strange questions about your PPP loan. They want to “verify” information. They want to “update records.” What there actualy doing is responding to a government inquiry. Banks have compliance departments that work closly with federal investigators. Your bank isnt on your side in this.

Option four: someone you know – a business partner, an accountant, a former employee – tells you they were contacted by investigators or recieved a grand jury subpoena. If the government is talking to people who know about your PPP loan, there building a case. The question is just wheather your the target or a witness.

Heres the critical mistake people make at this stage. They try to “get ahead of it.” They contact the agents to explain. They delete old emails or records that might look bad. They call other people who might be involved to coordinate stories. Every single one of these actions creates new criminal exposure. Deleting records is obstruction of justice under 18 USC 1519 – thats a seperate 20-year felony thats often easier to prove then the underlying fraud. Coordinating stories is witness tampering. Talking to agents without an attorney is how Martha Stewart went to prison – not for insider trading, but for lying about it.

Federal SBA Disaster Loan Fraud Beyond PPP

Federal SBA Disaster Loan Fraud Beyond PPP

What Are the Penalties for Wire Fraud Under Federal Law

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

"Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive…"

Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive and knowledgeable about my matter. He was available when needed to discuss things. Definitely recommend him to any and everyone!