Learn more about Spodek Law Group and how we can help with your case.
You think the person who committed PPP fraud is the person most at risk. They submitted the application. They received the money. They spent it on things they shouldnt have. If anyone goes to prison, its them.
That’s not how Dallas works.
Welcome to Spodek Law Group. Our goal is to tell you what other websites won’t: in the Northern District of Texas, the person who ENABLES PPP fraud faces harsher punishment then the people who commit it. Stephanie Hockridge didnt apply for PPP loans herself. She co-founded Blueacorn, a service that helped others apply. She coached applicants through fraudulent applications with a premium service called “VIPPP.” She got 10 years in federal prison and $63 million in restitution – more then most of the people she helped.
If you prepared applications for others, if you taught people how to apply, if you built a system that made fraud easier – Dallas prosecutors will come for you harder then they come for the people you helped.
Most people think PPP fraud is about the applicant. They submitted false information. They received money fraudulently. They’re the criminal.
That’s not how federal prosecutors in Dallas see it.
In the Northern District of Texas, prosecutors treat PPP fraud as a systemic problem. They’re not just looking for people who committed fraud – they’re looking for people who made fraud POSSIBLE. The accountants who prepaired false applications. The consultants who coached applicants on what to say. The service providers who basicaly created systems to process fraudulent applications at scale.
Here’s how this works in practice. You helped a friend apply for PPP. You filled out the paperwork. You knew some of the information wasnt accurate, but you figured it was their application, their responsibility. Wrong. Under federal conspiracy law, you became a participant in their fraud the moment you helped. And if you helped multiple people? You’re not a helper anymore. You’re an organizer.
The Northern District of Texas has demonstrated that facilitators face the harshest sentences. Stephanie Hockridge got 10 years for running Blueacorn. Tamara Starks got 86 months for organizing a scheme involving over 100 applications. The individual applicants in these schemes often got 3-5 years. The people who made the fraud EASY got 7-10 years.
If you helped others apply for PPP loans, you’re the primary target – not them. Dallas prosecutors understand that individual fraudsters can only steal so much. But facilitators multiply fraud across dozens or hundreds of applications. The bigger your role in making fraud possible, the longer your sentence.
What Dallas Sentences Actually Look Like
Let me show you whats actualy happening in the Northern District of Texas right now. Not guidelines. Not hypotheticals. Real sentences from real cases.
Stephanie Hockridge – Blueacorn co-founder. Facilitated $63 million in fraudulent PPP loans through her company. Coached applicants on how to submit false applications. Fabricated supporting documents. Sentence: 10 years (120 months). Restitution: $63 million. Former TV news anchor.
Dinesh Sah – Coppell businessman. $24.8 million in fraudulent applications, received $17 million. 15 applications to 8 different lenders. Bought 8 homes, Bentley, Corvette, Porsche. International wire transfers. Sentence: 135 months (11+ years). Restitution: $17.3 million. Forfeited homes, vehicles, $9 million seized.
Tamara Starks – Mansfield organizer. Over 100 PPP applications totaling $8.5 million. Organized scheme with others. Sentence: 86 months (7+ years). Restitution: $4,476,523.73.
Shantelle Hawkins – DeSoto. 17 fraudulent applications. Pleaded guilty to conspiracy. Sentence: 41 months. Restitution: $1.8 million. Property forfeited.
Jackson Family – Seven Dallas-area family members all pleaded guilty. Each claimed to be a sole proprietor with $8,000 monthly payroll. Submitted fake tax documents. Awaiting sentencing – each facing up to 5 years.
The Jackson family case demonstrates how Dallas handles coordinated fraud. Seven family members submitted PPP applications claiming each was a sole proprietor with aproximately $8,000 in monthly payroll. The applications included purported tax documents that provided false details about these supposed sole proprietorships. None of the businesses actualy existed. None of the payroll was real. The entire scheme was fabricated.
What makes this case instructive is that prosecutors charged ALL seven family members. They didnt just go after the person who organized the scheme. They didn’t give passes to family members who “just went along.” Everyone who participated faces federal prison time. The message is clear: participating in a coordinated fraud scheme means everyone gets charged, regardless of family relationships.
Here’s the pattern you should notice. The facilitators get hammered. Hockridge enabled $63 million in fraud and got 10 years. Starks organized 100+ applications and got 86 months. The individual applicants in family schemes are looking at 3-5 years each.
And the restitution is permanant. Hockridge owes $63 million that she cant discharge in bankruptcy. Sah owes $17.3 million. These aren’t theoretical numbers – these are amounts that follow defendants for the rest of their lives. Wages garnished. Tax refunds intercepted. Assets seized. The sentence dosent end when prison ends.
The forfeiture is equally devastating. Sah lost 8 homes and 6 luxury vehicles. Everything he bought with fraud proceeds became government property. The lifestyle PPP fraud funded becomes the evidence that justifies the forfeiture that takes it all away.
Prosecutors in the Northern District of Texas have shown they will pursue every avenue of punishment. Prison time. Massive restitution orders. Forfeiture of assets. The goal isn’t just punishment – it’s to make an example that deters others. When Hockridge’s 10-year sentence was announced, it sent a message to every facilitator still operating. When Sah’s luxury vehicles were seized, it showed that the government will take back everything fraud purchased. The combination of prison, restitution, and forfeiture ensures that PPP fraud destroys not just your freedom, but your financial future.
Here’s were most facilitators make the mistake that costs them a decade.
of criminal appeals in NJ result in reversal or new trial
of criminal cases in NJ are resolved through plea agreements
Statistics updated regularly based on latest available data
Saying 'my accountant told me to do it' isn't automatic protection. You need documentation of the advice AND proof you followed it exactly as given.
Returning items you didn't buy, using fake receipts, or 'wardrobing' (wearing and returning) isn't a minor issue – it's felony theft with serious consequences.
What this means practicaly is devastating. If you helped organize a PPP fraud scheme, every fraudulent application submitted by anyone in the scheme becomes YOUR crime too. You didn’t submit those applications. You didn’t receive that money. But you helped make them possible. Under conspiracy law, that makes you liable.
Hockridge learned this the hard way. She didn’t submit $63 million in fraudulent applications. Her company FACILITATED them. But under conspiracy law, every one of those applications counted against her at sentencing.
The sentencing guidelines treat conspiracy organizers harshly. If you recruited others into the scheme, that’s an enhancement. If you supervised others in the scheme, that’s another enhancement. If the scheme involved multiple participants, that’s another enhancement. The role adjustments compound rapidily.
Here’s how the federal sentencing guidelines calculate these enhancements. A leadership role in an offense involving five or more participants adds 4 levels to your base offense level. An organizer or leader role adds 4 levels. If you recruited accomplices, that can add 2 levels. Each level increase translates to significanly more prison time. For fraud cases in the range were seeing in Dallas, each additional level can mean 12-18 more months in prison.
The Dinesh Sah case shows how these enhancements compound. He submitted 15 applications to 8 different lenders. The base offense level for the fraud amount put him in serious territory. Then prosecutors added enhancements for sophistication – he created fake businesses with fake payroll. They added enhancements for use of minors or sophisticated means. They added enhancements for obstruction if he made false statements during the investigation. By the time all the enhancements were calculated, his guideline range was measured in years, not months.
Think about your own situation. Did you help anyone else apply for PPP? Did you prepare applications for others? Did you recommend a preparer who you knew was cutting corners? Each connection potentialy makes you part of a conspiracy. Each person you helped potentialy makes you an organizer.
The 10-year statute of limitations created by the PPP and Bank Fraud Enforcement Harmonization Act of 2022 means prosecutors have time to unravel every connection. Traditional fraud has a 5-year clock. PPP fraud has 10 years. If applications were submitted in 2020, exposure extends to 2030. Prosecutors aren’t rushing. They’re building conspiracy cases that capture every participant, with especial focus on the people who made the fraud possible.
Why Preparers and Accountants Are Primary Targets
If you’re an accountant, tax preparer, or business consultant who helped clients apply for PPP loans, you need to understand your exposure.
Dallas prosecutors view professional facilitators as force multipliers. One fraudulent applicant can steal a few hundred thousand dollars. One accountant who prepares fraudulent applications for 50 clients can enable millions in fraud. The accountant is the bigger target.
Consider the math prosecutors do. An individual fraudster applies once, maybe twice. They steal $100,000 or $200,000. Bad, but limited impact. An accountant who helps 50 clients apply, each for $100,000, has enabled $5 million in fraud. Same crime, fifty times the damage. Prosecutors understand that shutting down facilitators prevents far more fraud then prosecuting individual applicants.
The Blueacorn case is the extreme example, but the principle applies to every preparer and consultant who helped multiple clients. If you’re a CPA who prepared 20 questionable PPP applications, you’re a bigger fish then any of those 20 clients. If you’re a business consultant who coached 30 people through the application process, your exposure exceeds all of theirs combined.
And prosecutors know exactly how to find you. They subpoena bank records from applicants. They see who prepared the applications. They track patterns – multiple applications with similar structures, similar errors, similar fabricated documents. The patterns lead back to common preparers. The preparers become targets.
Here’s the part that should concern you most. Your clients might already be cooperating. When prosecutors arrest individual PPP fraudsters, they offer deals. Reduced sentences in exchange for information. And the most valuable information isn’t about other individual fraudsters – it’s about the people who helped MULTIPLE people commit fraud.
The person who prepared your clients’ applications. The consultant who recommended how to structure the applications. The accountant who created the supporting documents. That’s you. And your clients have every incentive to give you up in exchange for reduced sentences.
Every day you wait, more of your clients are potentialy facing charges and cooperating. Every client who cooperates names you. Every application you prepared becomes evidence. The case against you builds while you do nothing.
The cooperation calculus is brutal. Your former clients face prison time. Prosecutors offer them reduced sentences if they provide information about facilitators. You’re the facilitator. Your clients have every incentive to cooperate and minimal incentive to protect you. The relationship you thought was professional becomes the relationship that sends you to prison.
At Spodek Law Group, Todd Spodek has handled hundreds of federal fraud cases. The facilitators who call before their clients start cooperating have options. Voluntary disclosure. Proactive cooperation. Strategic positioning as someone who didnt understand they were participating in fraud. The facilitators who call after multiple clients have already named them are fighting conspiracy charges with overwhelming evidence.
Call 212-300-5196 before the people you helped start cooperating against you. Not becuase we’re trying to scare you into hiring a lawyer. Becuase in Dallas, with facilitator-focused prosecution and conspiracy enhancements and a 10-year statute of limitations, the applications you helped prepare could be the evidence that sends you to prison for longer then the people you helped.
Spodek Law Group. The Woolworth Building, 233 Broadway Suite 710, New York. We put this information on our website becuase most people who helped others with PPP applications have no idea they’re the primary target. Our goal isn’t to frighten you. It’s to make sure you understand that Dallas prosecutors dont just want the people who received fraudulent loans. They want the people who made the fraud possible. And those people face the harshest sentences.
In Dallas, helping becomes the crime. And helpers get punished most.
Franklin County PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers
San Bernardino County PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers
Riverside County PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers
Hennepin County PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
"Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive…"
Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive and knowledgeable about my matter. He was available when needed to discuss things. Definitely recommend him to any and everyone!
Reduction in pretrial jail population since NJ bail reform implementation.
Source: NJ Judiciary Annual ReportApproval rate for properly filed expungement petitions in NJ.
Source: NJ Courts Statistical ReportCommon Mistakes to Avoid
Actually Stay Silent
Most people know they have the right to remain silent but still talk to police. Anything you say can and will be used against you. Politely decline to answer questions until your attorney is present.
Bail Conditions Are Enforceable
Violating bail conditions, even minor ones, can result in immediate re-arrest and make it much harder to obtain bail again. Follow every condition to the letter.
Proven Track Record
Recent Case Results
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
SEE ALL CASE RESULTSWhat Our Clients Say
"When the federal government came after me, Todd and his team were the only ones who made me feel like I had a real chance. They understood the system inside and out and got my case dismissed."— Michael T., Federal Defense Client MORE REVIEWS
Lead Attorney & Founder
Todd Spodek
Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience to every case.
Need Help With Your Case?
Our experienced criminal defense attorneys are available 24/7 for a confidential consultation.
100% Confidential. Your information is protected.
Frequently Asked Questions
New Jersey reformed its bail system in 2017. Instead of a cash-based system, judges now use a Public Safety Assessment (PSA) to determine whether a defendant should be released pretrial. Most defendants are released with conditions, while those deemed high-risk may be detained. An experienced attorney can argue for favorable release conditions at your detention hearing.
No. You have the constitutional right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. Anything you say to police can be used against you in court. Politely invoke your rights by saying "I want to speak with my attorney before answering any questions." This cannot be held against you.
Attorney fees vary based on the complexity of the case, the charges involved, and whether the case goes to trial. At Spodek Law Group, we offer transparent pricing and flexible payment plans. We provide a free initial consultation to discuss your case and give you an honest assessment of costs. Investing in quality representation often saves far more in the long run than choosing the cheapest option.
An arraignment is your first court appearance after being charged with a crime. The judge will read the charges against you, and you'll enter a plea (usually not guilty at this stage). The judge will also set bail or release conditions. Having an attorney at your arraignment is critical, as they can advocate for favorable bail terms and begin building your defense strategy from day one.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
45 seconds that explain our difference