EPA Criminal Investigators at My Construction Site

Welcome to Spodek Law Group. Our goal is to give you the reality of what EPA criminal investigators at your construction site actually means - not the sanitized version state compliance officers present, not the "just a routine inspection" fiction, but the actual truth about what happens when federal agents with badges and arrest authority show up where you're building.

When EPA Special Agents arrive at your construction site, they're not there to inspect and give you a chance to fix problems. They've already been investigating you. The witnesses have been interviewed. Your permit history has been downloaded from the ECHO database. The disgruntled foreman you fired last month - he called the tip line on his way out the door. The site visit you're watching unfold isn't the beginning of an investigation. It's evidence collection for a prosecution package that's already being assembled.

The distinction between EPA compliance inspectors and EPA Criminal Investigation Division agents is the distinction between getting a citation and getting handcuffs. Regular inspectors wear polos and carry clipboards. Criminal investigators carry federal badges, sidearms, and the authority to arrest you on the spot. And heres the statistic that should stop you cold: 67 percent of EPA criminal investigations where a search warrant is served result in criminal charges. The warrant isnt the start of their work. Its near the end.

The Difference Between Inspectors and Investigators

Most construction site owners dont understand there are actualy two completely separate divisions within EPA enforcement. The civil side handles inspections, notices of violation, and penalties. They give you compliance schedules. They let you fix things. But the Criminal Investigation Division is law enforcement - full stop.

EPA Special Agents have the same federal authority as FBI agents when it comes to environmental crimes. They conduct arrests. They execute search warrants. They seize evidence including your computers, your phones, and every document in your office trailer. Heres the thing - when you see these agents on your site, your already past the point where explanations matter.

The Criminal Investigation Division has about 200 special agents nationwide, but dont let that number fool you. These are highly trained federal law enforcement officers who specialize exclusively in environmental crimes. They know construction sites. They know permit structures. They know exactly what to look for and exactly how to build a prosecutable case. The agents on your site right now have probaly worked dozens of similar cases - they understand your industry better then many compliance consultants.

What makes this particularly dangerous is the coordination. EPA CID dosent work alone. They partner with the Department of Justice Environmental Crimes Section, IRS Criminal Investigation, FBI, and state attorney general offices. The investigation your watching unfold may involve multiple agencies, each looking at different potential crimes. Environmental violations. Tax fraud. Wire fraud. False claims. One construction site investigation can spawn half a dozen federal charges.

The 90 percent conviction rate for federal environmental crimes should tell you something. Federal prosecutors dont bring cases they might lose. By the time your charged, theyve already decided the outcome. The trial is almost ceremonial at that point. Think about that for a moment before you decide to answer any questions without a lawyer present.

What They Already Know Before They Knock

Let that sink in. EPA criminal investigators dont show up to "find out what happened." They show up because they already know. Someone called the anonymous tip line - maybe a competitor who lost a bid, maybe an ex-employee with a grudge, maybe a neighbor who saw your trucks dumping something. The investigation started weeks or months ago.

Before agents ever set foot on your property, theyve already done the following: reviewed your entire permit history in the ECHO database, obtained records from state environmental agencies, interviewed the tipster, possibly conducted surveillance, and coordinated with the DOJ Environmental Crimes Section. Heres were it gets really concerning - they may have already presented evidence to a federal grand jury.

The EPA's ECHO database - the Enforcement and Compliance History Online system - contains every permit violation, every inspection, every notice youve ever recieved. When agents run your company name, they get a complete picture going back years. That permit violation from 2019 you thought was resolved? Its in there. The inspection where the state noted deficiencies? Documented. The complaint from three years ago that went nowhere at the state level? Now its part of a federal criminal file.

The site visit your watching isnt reconnaissance. Its evidence collection. Thats why there taking photos of everything. Thats why there documenting stormwater runoff patterns. Thats why there collecting soil and water samples. Every sample becomes an exhibit at trial. Every photo becomes evidence. And your compliance documents - the ones you thought protected you - there examining those for inconsistancies that prove fraud.

In May 2024, EPA announced enhanced civil-criminal coordination policies. What this means practially is that information from routine civil inspections now flows directly to criminal investigators. That "helpful" state inspector who came through last month? The notes from that visit might be sitting on a federal agents desk right now. The line between civil and criminal has basicly disappeared.

The Stormwater Violations That Send People to Federal Prison

OK so you might think stormwater violations are a paperwork issue. Fines, maybe. Compliance schedules, definately. But federal prison? Actualy, yes.

Bryan Stowe was a prominent Washington state developer. Successful. Established. His company Stowe Construction had been operating for years. Then EPA investigated stormwater permit violations at one of his projects. The weekly inspection reports and discharge sampling reports had been falsified. Permit violations contributed to two major landslides that closed a highway.

The sentence: six months federal prison. One year supervised release. $300,000 personal fine. The company paid $650,000 in criminal fines plus $100,000 to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. For stormwater. For falsified monitoring reports. This wasnt hazardous waste dumping - this was paperwork fraud on a construction permit.

And Stowe isnt the exception. Heres the part nobody talks about - every false certification you sign on a discharge monitoring report is potentially a seperate federal felony. You certified that best management practices were in place when they werent? Thats a false statement. You signed off on inspection logs that didnt match site conditions? Each one could be a count. The penalties stack. The prison time stacks.

Consider the math on a typical construction project. Weekly inspection reports for a year-long project means 52 potential false statement counts. Monthly discharge monitoring reports add another 12. Quarterly stormwater sampling certifications add more. If you signed certifications that didnt match reality - even if you beleived they were accurate - each signature is a potential five-year felony under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Federal prosecutors can stack these charges to achieve sentences that would shock you.

The federal sentencing guidelines for environmental crimes take into account the scope of harm, the duration of violations, and wheather the defendant held a position of trust or responsibility. As a construction site owner or project manager, you automaticaly trigger the "position of trust" enhancement. Your permit makes you the responsible party. That enhancement alone can add years to a potential sentence.

Why Your Subcontractor's Mistake Becomes Your Prison Sentence

Look, you hired specialists specificaly because you dont know how to handle certain things. Thats prudent business practice. Except in federal environmental law, it can become your undoing.

The Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine means you - the person in charge - face personal criminal liability for violations you didnt personally commit. You didnt know the subcontractor was cutting corners on asbestos removal? Dosent matter. You held authority over the project. You had the ability to prevent violations. Under federal law, thats enough.

Your permit is your responsibility. When subcontractors violate conditions of those permits, the permit holder is accountable. Not the sub. You. Let me show you how this plays out in real cases. Alexander and Raul Salvagno - father and son - ran asbestos abatement companies in New York. They conducted illegal asbestos removal at over 1,550 facilities over ten years. Schools. Churches. Hospitals. Military housing. When it finally collapsed, they recieved the two longest federal prison sentences ever for environmental crimes.

But wait - you might say those are extreme cases. Thats different from your situation. Heres the thing: every major prosecution started as what looked like a minor issue. The criminal investigators on your site right now? There evaluating wheather your case is prosecution-worthy. And the standard isnt wheather you knew about every violation. Its wheather you should have known.

The Interview That Destroys Your Defense

When EPA agents ask to talk to you about "some questions regarding site operations," your instinct will be to cooperate. To explain. To clear things up. Dont.

Heres another uncomfortable truth: talking to federal investigators without a lawyer present is how people incriminate themselves. Not through dramatic confessions, but through small inconsistancies. You say something that contradicts a document they've already collected. You provide a timeline that dosent match witness statements. You try to be helpful and in doing so, you hand them a false statement charge.

18 U.S.C. § 1001 makes it a federal crime to make false statements to government officials. The maximum penalty is five years in federal prison. Martha Stewart didnt go to prison for insider trading - she went to prison for lying to investigators. Michael Flynn, a three-star general, was convicted for false statements. The crime isnt the underlying violation. Its what you say when there asking about it.

At Spodek Law Group, weve seen this pattern repeat endlessly. The client who wanted to be cooperative. Who thought explaining the situation would help. Who assumed good faith on both sides. That client ended up with more charges then they started with - the original environmental violation plus false statement counts for every inconsistancy in their interview.

Theres another trap waiting in that interview. Federal agents often already know the answers to the questions there asking. There not gathering information - there testing you. When they ask about a specific date or a specific permit submission, they already have the document. They already know what it says. There watching to see if your answer matches. If it dosent - even if you just misremember - thats a false statement.

The agents conducting these interviews are trained interrogators. They know how to establish rapport. They know how to make you feel comfortable. They know how to get you talking. And once your talking, its very hard to stop. Every additional word you say is another opportunity to contradict something, to misremember something, to say something that dosent quite match the evidence theyve already collected. Silence is not just a right. In this situation, its a survival strategy.

How One Tip Becomes Federal Prosecution

The EPA tip line is anonymous. Completly anonymous. And its used more then you might think - by people who have very specific reasons to report you.

That foreman you terminated last week? Maybe he called. The competitor who lost the bid on this project? Perhaps they submitted an anonymous complaint. The neighbor whos been annoyed by construction noise? They might have reported "suspicious activity." The tipster could be anyone. And you will likely never know who started this.

But heres the kicker - once a credible tip comes in, it triggers a process. EPA criminal investigators verify the complaint. They pull your permit history. They contact state agencies. If theres enough there, they open a formal investigation. This can happen over weeks or months without you knowing. By the time agents arrive, theyve already built the foundation of a case.

Environmental Crime Task Forces coordinate federal, state, and local law enforcement. When EPA Criminal Investigation Division shows up, they may be working alongside IRS Criminal Investigation (looking for tax fraud), FBI (looking at wire fraud), state AG environmental units, and local prosecutors. One tip can spiral into a multi-agency federal investigation covering everything from environmental crimes to tax evasion to wire fraud.

What Happens in the First 48 Hours After They Arrive

The window after EPA criminal investigators first appear is the most critical period. What happens in the next 48 hours often determines wheather you become a defendant or avoid charges entirely.

First, you need to understand your rights. You do not have to consent to searches beyond open areas of the construction site. You do not have to answer questions. You have the right to legal representation before any interview. The agents may not tell you this clearly - their job is to collect evidence, not protect your rights.

What you absolutly cannot do: alter any documents, delete any emails or texts, coach employees on what to say, move or destroy any materials on site, or lie. Each of those actions is a seperate federal crime. Obstruction charges. Evidence tampering. Conspiracy. These can carry longer sentences then the original environmental violation.

What you should do: contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediatly. Not tommorow. Not after you "figure out whats going on." Right now. Before you say anything to anyone. Todd Spodek has represented clients facing exactly this situation - EPA agents on site, business at stake, future uncertain. The difference between clients who protected themselves and those who didnt often came down to that first phone call.

Preserve every document exactly as it exists. Dont organize anything. Dont "help" by gathering relevant materials. Instruct employees to cooperate with safety requirements but decline interviews without legal counsel present. Then call us at 212-300-5196.

Your employees need specific instructions. Most people want to be helpful when federal agents ask questions. They dont realize that helpfulness is exactly what creates criminal exposure for everyone involved. Each employee who talks without legal counsel is another potential witness against you - and another person who might incriminate themselves in the process. The chain of liability in environmental crimes can extend to site supervisors, project managers, and anyone who signed off on compliance documentation.

The first 48 hours are also when evidence preservation becomes critical. The agents are collecting physical evidence. Your simultaneously under an obligation not to destroy anything that might be relevant. But what is relevant? Without legal guidance, you might destroy something you dont realize matters - or preserve something in a way that damages your defense. This is why immediate legal representation isnt optional. Its the only way to navigate conflicting obligations that could each separately send you to prison.

The Documentation Problem Nobody Warns You About

Theres a paradox at the heart of environmental compliance. The records you create to demonstrate compliance become the prosecution's primary evidence when they show inconsistancies.

Your discharge monitoring reports. Your inspection logs. Your certifications. Every document with your signature. These were supposed to protect you. They were supposed to prove you were following the rules. Instead, when investigators compare what you certified to what they find on site, every discrepancy becomes proof of fraud.

If your inspection log says BMPs were in place on Tuesday but site photos from that date show otherwise - thats evidence. If your discharge sampling shows levels within permit limits but the labs numbers dont match - thats evidence. If you certified conditions that didnt exist, even if you beleived they did, the documentation proves a violation.

This is why having legal counsel before you create additional documentation is critical. The next report you file, the next certification you sign, could become Exhibit A in a federal prosecution. At Spodek Law Group, we help clients navigate this impossible situation - how to comply with ongoing reporting requirements without creating additional criminal exposure.

---

The agents on your site are not going away. The investigation will continue wheather you engage or not. The question is wheather your navigating this with experienced federal criminal defense representation or trying to handle it alone.

EPA criminal investigators have been doing this for decades. They know exactly what questions to ask, exactly how to get you to incriminate yourself, exactly how to build a case that leads to conviction. Your good intentions, your explanations, your desire to cooperate - none of that matters once a prosecution decision is made.

What matters is the next 48 hours. What matters is having someone who understands federal environmental criminal law standing between you and investigators who have one goal: building a case for prosecution. What matters is not becoming another statistic in that 90 percent conviction rate.

Call Spodek Law Group at 212-300-5196. Before you talk to anyone else. Before you answer any questions. Before you make any statements. The call is confidential. The consultation could be the difference between keeping your freedom and losing everything.