New York City Criminal Defense
Criminal Defense

Florida Anti-Kickback Defense

15 minutes readSpodek Law Group
FREE CASE EVALUATION

Learn more about Spodek Law Group and how we can help with your case.

Florida Anti-Kickback Defense: What Healthcare Providers Don't Know Until Its Too Late

Welcome to Spodek Law Group. Our mission is to give you the reality of Florida anti-kickback prosecutions - not the sanitized compliance version your healthcare attorney presented, not the reassuring fiction that "safe harbors" provide protection, but the actual truth about what happens when the Department of Justice decides your referral arrangements constitute criminal conduct.

Heres what keeps us up at night about these cases: by the time most Florida healthcare providers discover they're under investigation, the government has already spent two years building the case against them. Your Medicare billing data has been in federal databases the entire time. They didnt need to subpoena your records - they ran analytics on data they already possessed. That subpoena you just received? Its not the beginning of the investigation. Its the end.

Florida is not like other states when it comes to anti-kickback enforcement. The Department of Justice just announced charges against 324 defendants in its 2025 National Healthcare Fraud Takedown - a single enforcement action involving over $14.6 billion in alleged fraud. A disproportionate number of those defendants are Florida healthcare providers. The largest healthcare fraud case ever prosecuted in American history? That was Philip Esformes, a South Florida nursing home operator convicted in a scheme exceeding $1.3 billion. The Medicare Fraud Strike Force maintains permanent teams stationed specifically in South Florida because of the enforcement opportunity your state represents.

How Florida Became The Healthcare Fraud Prosecution Capital

Florida's demographics created this reality. The state has one of the highest concentrations of Medicare beneficiaries in the country - an elderly population that needs healthcare services, generating the exact billing volume that makes fraud prosecutions productive for federal law enforcement. Its not that Florida providers are more corrupt then providers elsewhere. Its that Florida provides a target-rich environment where the same investigative resources generate larger cases with more impressive dollar figures.

Look at what emerged from just the 2025 takedown. Chad Monroe from Tarpon Springs was charged for a scheme to fraudulently bill Medicare more then $28 million for orthotic braces while receiving $15 million in illegal kickbacks for genetic testing. Paula Pirone from Ocala and Sophie Dufort from Gainesville were charged for an $8.6 million scheme paying kickbacks for medically unneccesary orthotic braces. These werent fringe operators. They were established DME companies that had been operating for years before the government decided their "marketing arrangements" constituted federal crimes.

The criminal recoveries tell the story. 2024 saw $961 million in healthcare fraud criminal recoveries - the highest amount in ten years and more then double the rolling five-year average. That money came from somewhere. It came from providers like you who thought there arrangements were legal.

Notice the pattern in these cases. The government doesnt go after providers who are operating in obvious shadows - the ones running pure billing mills with no actual patients. They go after established practices with real staff, real patients, and arrangements that look exactly like what every other successful healthcare business uses. The marketing companies. The referral relationships. The medical director agreements. The space rental deals structured to provide "fair market value." These arrangements are industry standard - until federal prosecutors decide they constitute criminal conduct.

Heres were the Florida environment becomes particuarly dangerous: the combination of high Medicare volume, aggressive Strike Force presence, and political pressure to show results creates what amounts to a prosecution lottery. Same arrangements operating in Ohio might never attract attention. In Florida, they generate headlines and career-advancing convictions.

The "One Purpose" Test That Destroys Your Defense

Heres were most Florida healthcare providers get this catastrophicaly wrong. They beleive - because their compliance attorneys told them, because industry practice suggested it, because everyone else does it - that anti-kickback violations require the government to prove criminal intent. That if you didnt KNOW you were breaking the law, you cant be convicted of breaking it.

That is not how the Anti-Kickback Statute works.

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute uses whats called the "one purpose" test. Prosecutors dont need to prove that the primary purpose of your payment arrangement was to induce referrals. They only need to prove that ONE purpose - even a secondary, minor, almost incidental purpose - was to influence referral decisions. Think about that. Every marketing arrangement, every medical director fee, every space rental agreement you've ever entered could be examined under this standard.

And heres the part that should terrify you: the government does not need to prove patient harm. The government does not need to prove financial loss to Medicare or Medicaid programs. The government does not even need to prove that the services billed were medically unneccesary. A physician can be guilty of violating the Anti-Kickback Statute even if they actualy rendered the service and even if the service was genuinely medically necessary.

Let that sink in. You provided real care to real patients who really needed it - and you can still be convicted of a federal felony because ONE purpose of ONE payment in ONE referral relationship was to influence where those patients sought care.

The practical implication is devastating. Every financial relationship between healthcare providers becomes suspect. You pay a physician to serve as medical director for your home health agency - legitimate service, fair market value, signed contract, everything your lawyer told you was required. But if prosecutors can establish that ONE reason you selected that physician was because they also refer patients to your agency? Violation. The medical directorship might be genuine. The compensation might be appropriate. The work might be real. None of that matters if referral inducement was ONE purpose.

Weve seen this destroy physicians who had no idea. They accepted a consultant arrangement that seemed normal. They served on an advisory board that paid an honorarium. They entered a joint venture structured by healthcare attorneys. The arrangement operated for years without incident. Then federal investigators arrived, and suddenly these providers learned that arrangements blessed by lawyers and common throughout the industry could still constitute federal felonies under the "one purpose" test.

Why Safe Harbors Wont Save You

Every healthcare provider in Florida has heard about safe harbors. Your compliance officer probably has a chart on the wall. The personal services safe harbor. The rental safe harbor. The employee compensation safe harbor. The 37 regulatory safe harbors that supposedly protect legitimate business arrangements from prosecution.

Heres the reality practitioners know but compliance presentations skip: to be protected by a safe harbor, an arrangement must fit "squarely" in the safe harbor and satisfy ALL of its requirements. Not most requirements. Not the important requirements. All of them. Every element. Every criteria.

OK so what happens if you deviate from even one element? The OIG's own guidance states that deviations from safe harbors "provide law enforcement greater prosecutorial discretion to investigate and possibly prosecute the participants." Greater prosecutorial discretion. Thats federal regulatory language for "we can come after you if we want to."

Facing Criminal Charges And Have Questions? We Can Help, Tell Us What Happened.

And heres were it gets worse. Even if you thought you fit in a safe harbor, even if your compliance attorney blessed the arrangement, even if you obtained an OIG advisory opinion - none of that binds enforcement decisions. Advisory opinions explicitly state they dont prevent prosecution. Your attorney's opinion isnt a shield. Its not even relevant to whether the government decides to charge you.

The irony is brutal. Safe harbors were supposedly created to protect legitimate arrangements. But there so narrowly drafted that most real-world business relationships - the kind that actually operate healthcare in Florida - fall outside them. The very complexity of healthcare finance means the "protection" was designed to be unavailable in most situations.

Consider the personal services safe harbor - one of the most commonly invoked. To qualify, the arrangement must be in writing, signed by the parties, specify the services to be provided, specify the schedule of services if the term is less then one year, specify the compensation which must be set in advance and consistant with fair market value, not take into account the volume or value of referrals, and involve services that don't exceed what is reasonably necessry to accomplish the commercially reasonable business purpose of the services. Miss any element and the safe harbor evaporates.

In practice, this means the contract you drafted with your healthcare attorney - the one that was supposed to protect you - might fail multiple elements upon close prosecutorial examination. The schedule wasnt specific enough. The compensation formula arguably relates to volume. The services exceeded what was "reasonably necessary." Prosecutors are trained to find these gaps, and in Florida's enforcement environment, they have incentive to look.

What Happens Before You Know Your Being Investigated

This is the part that should fundamentaly change how you think about your exposure. By the time you recieve that first grand jury subpoena, by the time FBI agents show up to interview your billing staff, by the time your assets get frozen - the investigation has been running for 18 to 24 months. Often longer.

The Medicare Strike Force teams stationed in South Florida use data analytics to identify statistical outliers in billing patterns. They dont need to investigate to find suspects - the billing data is already in government databases. They run algorithms. They identify anomalies. They see that your facility receives a unusually high percentage of referrals from a specific physician. They see that your DME company's ordering patterns dont match statistical norms. They see that your home health agency's patient acquisition timeline suggests patient brokering.

Heres the hidden connection most providers miss: your own documentation becomes the evidence against you. That contract you drafted to make the arrangement look legitimate? It proves remuneration. Those marketing agreements you thought protected the relationship? They document the quid pro quo. Every email, every text message, every check written - its all sitting in records you created, just waiting to be subpoenaed after the data analytics already built the case.

Todd Spodek often explains this to clients facing the initial shock of investigation: you are not at the beginning of anything. You are at the END of a prosecutorial process that began years before you knew. The decisions that will determine your future were made before you received any notice. The question now is damage control.

The Whistleblower Problem You Didnt See Coming

Theres another mechanism destroying Florida healthcare providers that most never anticipate: the qui tam whistleblower lawsuit.

Under the False Claims Act, private individuals can file complaints alleging fraud against government healthcare programs. These complaints are filed under seal - meaning you have no knowledge they exist. The government investigates for months or years while the complaint remains secret. The whistleblower who filed? They stand to recieve between 15% and 30% of whatever the government recovers.

Read that again. The person who turns you in has a direct financial incentive measured in millions of dollars. And prosecuters treat financially incentivized whistleblowers as credible witnesses.

But wait. It gets more uncomfortable. The whistleblower is usualy someone inside your organization. A disgruntled billing specialist. A terminated office manager. A competitor who learned about your arrangements through industry gossip. Someone with access to the exact documentation that proves the elements of anti-kickback violation.

At Spodek Law Group, weve seen how this plays out. Your former employee files the qui tam complaint. DOJ investigates for two years while you have no idea. Then suddenly: the complaint is unsealed AND criminal charges are filed simultaneously. Your former billing coordinator is now a cooperating witness with immunity. The documentation they provided during the sealed period has already been analyzed, organized, and prepared for prosecution.

Your own staff can become the witnesses who convict you. Not because they intended harm - but because the financial incentive structure of False Claims Act enforcement turned them into government assets.

When Your Practice Dies Before Trial

Heres the uncomfortable truth about Florida anti-kickback prosecution that nobody discusses in compliance seminars: your practice is effectivly destroyed before any jury ever determines your guilt or innocence.

Upon indictment - not conviction, just indictment - several things happen automaticaly or nearly automaticaly:

Your assets may be frozen pending trial. Operating capital vanishes. Payroll becomes impossible. Staff leave because you cant pay them.

Your professional liability insurance may be cancelled or coverage denied for claims arising from alleged criminal conduct. Hospitals may suspend your privileges immediatly upon learning of federal charges. Referral sources disappear overnight because nobody wants association with a federal healthcare fraud defendant.

And if your convicted - which happens in over 90% of federal criminal cases that proceed to trial - exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid is mandatory. Not discretionary. Mandatory. Your eligibility to bill the federal programs that constitute the majority of most Florida healthcare revenue simply ends.

New York City skyline

Legal Pulse: Key Statistics

25%Trial Success Rate

of cases that go to trial result in acquittal with private counsel

Source: NJ Defense Bar

15%Appeals Success

of criminal appeals in NJ result in reversal or new trial

Source: NJ Appellate Courts

Statistics updated regularly based on latest available data

Think about what that means practicaly. Even a provider who recieves a sentence of probation with no prison time is excluded from Medicare. Even someone who pays a fine and walks away free has lost the ability to practice medicine in any context involving federal healthcare programs. The felony conviction triggers licensing board review in most states. The practice doesnt just decline - it ends.

This is why the conviction rate matters so much. Federal prosecutors in healthcare fraud cases have effectively unlimited resources. They only bring cases they beleive they will win. By the time charges are filed, theyve already obtained cooperating witnesses, analyzed the billing data, and calculated their sentencing recommendations. The trial is often a formality. The real question is what happens during negotiation.

The financial destruction operates independantly of criminal outcome. Civil monetary penalties under the Anti-Kickback Statute reach $100,000 per violation - and each claim submitted can constitute a seperate violation. Under the False Claims Act, penalties of up to $27,894 per claim apply, plus the government recovers three times the amount of the fraudulent billing. For a practice that has submitted thousands of claims over several years of operation, the mathematical exposure can exceed the net worth of everyone involved combined.

And theres no way to just "pay it off" and continue practicing. The exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid is permanant unless sucessfully appealed - a process that can take years and often fails. During that time, no federal program billing. No Medicaid patients. No Medicare patients. For specialists in fields like home health, hospice, or skilled nursing where federal programs dominate the payer mix, exclusion means closure.

The Florida Patient Brokering Act: The State Trap

Most Florida healthcare providers focus exclusively on federal anti-kickback exposure. This is a critical mistake.

Florida has its own anti-kickback statute - the Patient Brokering Act, Florida Statute 817.505 - and it is significently broader then federal law.

Heres the hidden connection: while the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute applies only to arrangements involving federal governmental payers, Florida's Patient Brokering Act applies to ALL payers. Including private insurance. Including self-pay arrangements. Including every commercial contract your practice has ever accepted.

That means an arrangement could be completely legal under federal law - because it involves no Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement - and still constitute a third-degree felony under Florida state law. You could structure your entire practice to avoid federal programs, and Florida prosecutors could still charge you with patient brokering.

The penalties compound. Federal anti-kickback violation: up to 10 years per count. Florida Patient Brokering Act: third-degree felony, up to 5 years prison, $5,000 fines. But those run consecutivly when parallel prosecutions occur. And they often do.

Florida prosecutors work alongside federal Strike Force teams. Information sharing is routine. Cases that dont meet federal thresholds get referred to state prosecutors. Cases that do meet federal thresholds often trigger simultaneous state charges. Your exposure isnt single-layer. Its multi-jurisdictional, and each layer carries its own penalties, its own conviction consequences, its own professional licensing implications.

Building Your Defense When Time Has Already Run Out

If your reading this, your probably in one of two situations. Either youve already received notice of investigation - a subpoena, an interview request, a target letter - or you have arrangements in your practice that you now realize might constitute exposure.

Heres what Todd Spodek tells every Florida healthcare provider who calls Spodek Law Group in crisis: the time you thought you had is gone, but the time remaining matters more than you realize.

If investigation has already begun, your immediate priority is understanding what the government already knows and what witnesses theyve already contacted. Every day without representation is a day when someone in your organization might be interviewed without understanding their rights. Every week without legal strategy is a week when cooperating witnesses are being developed against you.

If you havnt yet received notice but recognize exposure in your arrangements, you have a narrow window for proactive measures that become impossible once investigation becomes overt. Voluntary disclosure programs exist. Compliance remediation can impact how the government views intent. But these options evaporate the moment formal investigation begins.

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute carries up to $100,000 in civil penalties per kickback plus treble damages under the False Claims Act. For arrangements that have been operating for years, generating thousands of claims, the exposure calculation becomes existential. We have seen providers facing theoretical liability in the tens of millions from arrangements they genuinely believed were legal.

This is not about whether you intended to break the law. Under the "one purpose" test, intent as you understand it is almost irrelevant. This is about whether you can demonstrate legitimate business justification, fair market value, and arrangement structures that undermine prosecutorial theories.

The phone number is 212-300-5196. Every day you wait is a day the government continues building its case with your billing data, your documentation, and potentially your former employees. The question isnt whether you did anything wrong. The question is whether the prosecution machinery targeting Florida healthcare providers will decide your arrangements fit their pattern.

They had years to investigate. You have days to respond. Use them.

New York City Skyline
Free Consultation

Need Help With Your Case?

Don't face criminal charges alone. Our experienced defense attorneys are ready to fight for your rights and freedom.

100% Confidential
Response Within 1 Hour
No Obligation Consultation

Or call us directly:

(212) 300-5196
Todd Spodek
Defense Team Spotlight

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar AdmittedNJ Bar AdmittedFederal Courts
Meet the Full Team

Legal Scenario: What Would You Do?

Attorney Todd Spodek

Scenario

You have an old conviction affecting your job prospects.

Can it be expunged?

Attorney's Answer

Many NJ convictions are expungable after waiting periods. Expungement legally allows you to deny the arrest or conviction.

This is general information only. Contact us for advice specific to your situation.

50+Years Experience
5,000+Cases Handled
24/7Availability
98%Client Satisfaction
Todd Spodek at courthouse

Recent Wins & Recognition

Award2024

Avvo Top Attorney

Firm attorneys maintain perfect 10.0 Avvo ratings for criminal defense.

Award2024

Super Lawyers Recognition

Todd Spodek recognized as New York Super Lawyer for Criminal Defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

Spodek Law Group By The Numbers

12
Cases Handled This Year
and counting
15,512+
Total Clients Served
since 2005
94%
Case Success Rate
dismissals & reduced charges
50+
Years Combined Experience
in criminal defense

Data as of January 2026

Todd Spodek in office

Facing Criminal Charges?

Get the aggressive defense you deserve from day one

24/7 emergency line available

Get Advice From An Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer

All You Have To Do Is Call (212) 300-5196 To Receive Your Free Case Evaluation.

CHARGES
DISMISSED

Aggravated Assault

DISMISSED /
DOWNGRADED

DWI

CHARGES
DISMISSED

Drug Possession

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

What Our
Clients Say

"Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive..."

Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive and knowledgeable about my matter. He was available when needed to discuss things. Definitely recommend him to any and everyone!

— Russell H.

MORE REVIEWS
Client consultation
Todd Spodek walking to courthouse
Spodek Law Group office

Watch: Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

45 seconds that explain our difference