Learn more about Spodek Law Group and how we can help with your case.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX): CEOs and CFOs Face Personal Liability
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was enacted to protect investors from corporate accounting fraud. In addition to imposing various corporate compliance obligations, SOX also creates personal liability risk for corporate executives.
Specifically, CEOs and CFOs face the risk of substantial fines and long-term federal imprisonment if they violate SOX’s personal certification requirements. As the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) explains, the law’s annual certification requirements apply to “the signing officer” who was in the role during the covered period—and failing to fulfill these requirements can have severe consequences for those who sign off on the annual filings submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The Personal Certification Requirements Under SOX
Broadly, SOX requires public companies’ CEOs and CFOs to certify that their companies’ annual reports are both accurate and in compliance with all applicable federal laws and regulations. Under the statute, CEOs and CFOs must not only certify the accuracy of the financial statements included in public companies’ annual reports, but they must certify the efficacy of their companies’ internal controls as well.
The specific personal certification requirements under SOX are:
Section 906 of SOX requires CEOs and CFOs to certify that their companies’ annual reports “fully compl[y] with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.” While Section 906 does not specifically discuss internal controls, they are referenced in Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, as well as in SEC Regulation S-K (which interprets and implements these statutory provisions).
Penalties for Violating the Personal Certification Requirements Under SOX
CEOs and CFOs who violate the personal certification requirements under SOX can face criminal prosecution by the DOJ. Federal prosecutors can pursue charges under Section 906 as well as under various other federal statutes—including the federal wire fraud statute and the False Statements Act.
The statutory penalties for violating the personal certification requirements under SOX are:
- To knowingly certify a public company’s annual report when it does not comply with federal securities laws or SEC regulations (including GAAP) is a criminal felony punishable by a fine of up to $1,000,000 and up to 10 years of federal imprisonment.
- To willfully violate the personal certification requirements under SOX is a criminal felony punishable by a fine of up to $5,000,000 and up to 20 years of federal imprisonment.
Along with fines and prison time, CEOs and CFOs who violate the personal certification requirements under SOX can face additional penalties as well. For example, under Section 1103 of SOX, public companies’ CEOs and CFOs can be subject to an SEC order freezing their personal assets if they are suspected of being involved in a SOX violation. The SEC can seek a freeze order before (or even without) filing a formal complaint, and it can obtain a freeze order on an ex parte basis (i.e., without having to provide the CEO or CFO with advance notice).
CEOs and CFOs who violate the personal certification requirements under SOX can face civil enforcement action and penalties as well. While SOX generally focuses on the public companies themselves, some provisions can apply to CEOs and CFOs, and the SEC can pursue civil enforcement action for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act, the SEC’s regulations, and other provisions of federal law. For example, under Section 1102 of SOX, it is a criminal offense to “corruptly alter[], destroy[], mutilate[], or conceal[] a record, document, or other object, or attempt[] to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding.” Attempting to alter or conceal corporate records is also a civil offense that can trigger substantial penalties.
When Are CEOs and CFOs at Risk of Facing Personal Liability Under SOX?
Given the substantial risks involved, CEOs and CFOs need to do everything they can to avoid violating SOX’s personal certification requirements. This starts with understanding the risks involved.
The SEC and DOJ can pursue enforcement action against CEOs and CFOs for SOX violations that are either knowing or willful. As discussed above, knowing violations carry maximum fines of $1,000,000 and up to 10 years of federal imprisonment, while willful violations carry fines of up to $5,000,000 and up to 20 years of federal imprisonment. So, when are SOX violations considered knowing, and when are they considered willful?
Knowing SOX Violations: When a CEO or CFO certifies an annual report knowing that it contains false or misleading information, this is considered a knowing SOX violation. For example, if a CEO or CFO certifies financial statements knowing that those statements are not in compliance with GAAP, this would constitute a knowing violation. The same is true if a CEO or CFO certifies a company’s annual report knowing that the company’s internal controls are not in compliance with federal law.
reduction in pretrial jail population since NJ bail reform
approval rate for properly filed expungement petitions in NJ
Statistics updated regularly based on latest available data
Saying 'I want to remain silent' isn't enough – you must actually stop talking. Officers can keep asking questions, and anything you say after can still be used.
Bail Conditions Are Enforceable
Violating any bail condition – even minor ones like missing a check-in – can result in immediate arrest and revocation of release. Take every condition seriously.
Willful SOX Violations: When a CEO or CFO not only knows that a company’s annual report or internal controls are not in compliance, but takes affirmative steps to hide or perpetuate the noncompliance, this is considered a willful SOX violation. In effect, knowingly violating SOX is a criminal offense, and willfully violating SOX is an aggravated criminal offense.
How Can CEOs and CFOs Avoid Personal Liability Under SOX?
To avoid personal liability under SOX, CEOs and CFOs must have a clear understanding of their companies’ annual reporting and internal control compliance obligations. They must also have a clear understanding of their companies’ annual reporting procedures and internal control mechanisms. CEOs and CFOs must ensure that their companies’ systems are functioning properly and in compliance with all pertinent federal laws and regulations. They must also ensure that their companies’ annual reports and other filings with the SEC contain only truthful and complete information.
What Happens if a CEO or CFO Violates SOX?
If a CEO or CFO violates SOX, the SEC or DOJ may launch a federal investigation. If the SEC or DOJ uncovers evidence of a violation, it may bring formal charges, and the CEO or CFO may face fines and federal imprisonment.
How Does the SEC Investigate SOX Violations Involving CEOs and CFOs?
The SEC investigates SOX violations involving CEOs and CFOs using several means. Typically, the SEC’s SOX investigations involve a combination of whistleblower complaints, mandatory filings, and compliance monitoring.
When Can CEOs and CFOs Be Held Personally Liable Under SOX?
CEOs and CFOs can be held personally liable under SOX when they violate the statute’s personal certification requirements. CEOs and CFOs can also face personal liability for conspiring to violate SOX’s corporate reporting requirements and for attempting to defraud investors.
What Are the Potential Consequences of Violating SOX’s Personal Certification Requirements?
In broad terms, the potential consequences of violating SOX’s personal certification requirements include substantial fines and long-term federal imprisonment. The specific consequences in any particular case will depend on the specific allegations against the CEO or CFO and the severity of the alleged violation.
Contact the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Defense Lawyers at Spodek Law Group
If you need to know more about avoiding personal liability under SOX, we encourage you to get in touch. To arrange a complimentary initial consultation with a senior Sarbanes-Oxley defense lawyer at Spodek Law Group, please call 212-300-5196 or contact us online today.
Federal Wire Fraud vs. Securities Fraud: Key Differences and Overlap
Board Member Liability for Securities Fraud
How to Defend Against Securities Fraud Charges
How Long Can You Go to Jail for Securities Fraud?
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
"Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive…"
Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive and knowledgeable about my matter. He was available when needed to discuss things. Definitely recommend him to any and everyone!
Reduction in pretrial jail population since NJ bail reform implementation.
Source: NJ Judiciary Annual ReportApproval rate for properly filed expungement petitions in NJ.
Source: NJ Courts Statistical ReportCommon Mistakes to Avoid
Actually Stay Silent
Most people know they have the right to remain silent but still talk to police. Anything you say can and will be used against you. Politely decline to answer questions until your attorney is present.
Bail Conditions Are Enforceable
Violating bail conditions, even minor ones, can result in immediate re-arrest and make it much harder to obtain bail again. Follow every condition to the letter.
Proven Track Record
Recent Case Results
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
SEE ALL CASE RESULTSWhat Our Clients Say
"Facing an SEC investigation was terrifying. The Spodek team negotiated a resolution that preserved my career and my reputation. Their knowledge of securities law is unmatched."— David A., SEC Defense Client MORE REVIEWS
Lead Attorney & Founder
Todd Spodek
Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience to every case.
Need Help With Your Case?
Our experienced criminal defense attorneys are available 24/7 for a confidential consultation.
100% Confidential. Your information is protected.
Frequently Asked Questions
New Jersey reformed its bail system in 2017. Instead of a cash-based system, judges now use a Public Safety Assessment (PSA) to determine whether a defendant should be released pretrial. Most defendants are released with conditions, while those deemed high-risk may be detained. An experienced attorney can argue for favorable release conditions at your detention hearing.
No. You have the constitutional right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. Anything you say to police can be used against you in court. Politely invoke your rights by saying "I want to speak with my attorney before answering any questions." This cannot be held against you.
Attorney fees vary based on the complexity of the case, the charges involved, and whether the case goes to trial. At Spodek Law Group, we offer transparent pricing and flexible payment plans. We provide a free initial consultation to discuss your case and give you an honest assessment of costs. Investing in quality representation often saves far more in the long run than choosing the cheapest option.
An arraignment is your first court appearance after being charged with a crime. The judge will read the charges against you, and you'll enter a plea (usually not guilty at this stage). The judge will also set bail or release conditions. Having an attorney at your arraignment is critical, as they can advocate for favorable bail terms and begin building your defense strategy from day one.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
45 seconds that explain our difference