New York City Criminal Defense
SEC Defense

Sarbanes-Oxley Personal Liability Explained

7 minutes readSpodek Law Group
FREE CASE EVALUATION

Learn more about Spodek Law Group and how we can help with your case.

Sarbanes-Oxley Personal Liability Explained

Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX): CEOs and CFOs Face Personal Liability

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was enacted to protect investors from corporate accounting fraud. In addition to imposing various corporate compliance obligations, SOX also creates personal liability risk for corporate executives.

Specifically, CEOs and CFOs face the risk of substantial fines and long-term federal imprisonment if they violate SOX’s personal certification requirements. As the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) explains, the law’s annual certification requirements apply to “the signing officer” who was in the role during the covered period—and failing to fulfill these requirements can have severe consequences for those who sign off on the annual filings submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The Personal Certification Requirements Under SOX

Broadly, SOX requires public companies’ CEOs and CFOs to certify that their companies’ annual reports are both accurate and in compliance with all applicable federal laws and regulations. Under the statute, CEOs and CFOs must not only certify the accuracy of the financial statements included in public companies’ annual reports, but they must certify the efficacy of their companies’ internal controls as well.

The specific personal certification requirements under SOX are:

1. Section 302

Section 302 of SOX requires public companies’ CEOs and CFOs to certify (i) the accuracy of their companies’ financial statements, and (ii) that their companies’ internal controls are effective. While SOX Section 302 primarily addresses corporate reporting requirements, it also imposes personal certification obligations on CEOs and CFOs.

Notably, Section 302 does not require CEOs and CFOs to certify their companies’ compliance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). However, companies must still prepare their financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and CEOs and CFOs should not sign personal certifications under Section 302 if they know that their companies have violated GAAP’s requirements.

Facing Criminal Charges And Have Questions? We Can Help, Tell Us What Happened.

2. Section 906

Section 906 of SOX requires CEOs and CFOs to certify that their companies’ annual reports “fully compl[y] with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.” While Section 906 does not specifically discuss internal controls, they are referenced in Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, as well as in SEC Regulation S-K (which interprets and implements these statutory provisions).

Penalties for Violating the Personal Certification Requirements Under SOX

CEOs and CFOs who violate the personal certification requirements under SOX can face criminal prosecution by the DOJ. Federal prosecutors can pursue charges under Section 906 as well as under various other federal statutes—including the federal wire fraud statute and the False Statements Act.

The statutory penalties for violating the personal certification requirements under SOX are:

Along with fines and prison time, CEOs and CFOs who violate the personal certification requirements under SOX can face additional penalties as well. For example, under Section 1103 of SOX, public companies’ CEOs and CFOs can be subject to an SEC order freezing their personal assets if they are suspected of being involved in a SOX violation. The SEC can seek a freeze order before (or even without) filing a formal complaint, and it can obtain a freeze order on an ex parte basis (i.e., without having to provide the CEO or CFO with advance notice).

CEOs and CFOs who violate the personal certification requirements under SOX can face civil enforcement action and penalties as well. While SOX generally focuses on the public companies themselves, some provisions can apply to CEOs and CFOs, and the SEC can pursue civil enforcement action for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act, the SEC’s regulations, and other provisions of federal law. For example, under Section 1102 of SOX, it is a criminal offense to “corruptly alter[], destroy[], mutilate[], or conceal[] a record, document, or other object, or attempt[] to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding.” Attempting to alter or conceal corporate records is also a civil offense that can trigger substantial penalties.

When Are CEOs and CFOs at Risk of Facing Personal Liability Under SOX?

Given the substantial risks involved, CEOs and CFOs need to do everything they can to avoid violating SOX’s personal certification requirements. This starts with understanding the risks involved.

The SEC and DOJ can pursue enforcement action against CEOs and CFOs for SOX violations that are either knowing or willful. As discussed above, knowing violations carry maximum fines of $1,000,000 and up to 10 years of federal imprisonment, while willful violations carry fines of up to $5,000,000 and up to 20 years of federal imprisonment. So, when are SOX violations considered knowing, and when are they considered willful?

Knowing SOX Violations: When a CEO or CFO certifies an annual report knowing that it contains false or misleading information, this is considered a knowing SOX violation. For example, if a CEO or CFO certifies financial statements knowing that those statements are not in compliance with GAAP, this would constitute a knowing violation. The same is true if a CEO or CFO certifies a company’s annual report knowing that the company’s internal controls are not in compliance with federal law.

New York City skyline

Legal Pulse: Key Statistics

44%Bail Reform Impact

reduction in pretrial jail population since NJ bail reform

Source: NJ Judiciary 2024

92%Expungement Success

approval rate for properly filed expungement petitions in NJ

Source: NJ Courts 2024

Statistics updated regularly based on latest available data

Willful SOX Violations: When a CEO or CFO not only knows that a company’s annual report or internal controls are not in compliance, but takes affirmative steps to hide or perpetuate the noncompliance, this is considered a willful SOX violation. In effect, knowingly violating SOX is a criminal offense, and willfully violating SOX is an aggravated criminal offense.

FAQs: Avoiding Personal Liability Under SOX

How Can CEOs and CFOs Avoid Personal Liability Under SOX?

To avoid personal liability under SOX, CEOs and CFOs must have a clear understanding of their companies’ annual reporting and internal control compliance obligations. They must also have a clear understanding of their companies’ annual reporting procedures and internal control mechanisms. CEOs and CFOs must ensure that their companies’ systems are functioning properly and in compliance with all pertinent federal laws and regulations. They must also ensure that their companies’ annual reports and other filings with the SEC contain only truthful and complete information.

What Happens if a CEO or CFO Violates SOX?

If a CEO or CFO violates SOX, the SEC or DOJ may launch a federal investigation. If the SEC or DOJ uncovers evidence of a violation, it may bring formal charges, and the CEO or CFO may face fines and federal imprisonment.

How Does the SEC Investigate SOX Violations Involving CEOs and CFOs?

The SEC investigates SOX violations involving CEOs and CFOs using several means. Typically, the SEC’s SOX investigations involve a combination of whistleblower complaints, mandatory filings, and compliance monitoring.

When Can CEOs and CFOs Be Held Personally Liable Under SOX?

CEOs and CFOs can be held personally liable under SOX when they violate the statute’s personal certification requirements. CEOs and CFOs can also face personal liability for conspiring to violate SOX’s corporate reporting requirements and for attempting to defraud investors.

What Are the Potential Consequences of Violating SOX’s Personal Certification Requirements?

In broad terms, the potential consequences of violating SOX’s personal certification requirements include substantial fines and long-term federal imprisonment. The specific consequences in any particular case will depend on the specific allegations against the CEO or CFO and the severity of the alleged violation.

Contact the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Defense Lawyers at Spodek Law Group

If you need to know more about avoiding personal liability under SOX, we encourage you to get in touch. To arrange a complimentary initial consultation with a senior Sarbanes-Oxley defense lawyer at Spodek Law Group, please call 212-300-5196 or contact us online today.
New York City Skyline
Free Consultation

Need Help With Your Case?

Don't face criminal charges alone. Our experienced defense attorneys are ready to fight for your rights and freedom.

100% Confidential
Response Within 1 Hour
No Obligation Consultation

Or call us directly:

(212) 300-5196
Todd Spodek
Defense Team Spotlight

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar AdmittedNJ Bar AdmittedFederal Courts
Meet the Full Team

Legal Scenario: What Would You Do?

Attorney Todd Spodek

Scenario

You were arrested and want to know about bail.

How does bail work in NJ?

Attorney's Answer

NJ uses a risk-based system rather than cash bail. A public safety assessment determines release conditions.

This is general information only. Contact us for advice specific to your situation.

50+Years Experience
5,000+Cases Handled
24/7Availability
98%Client Satisfaction
Todd Spodek at courthouse

Recent Wins & Recognition

Media Recognition2024

CNN Legal Analysis

Firm attorneys regularly provide expert legal commentary on high-profile criminal cases.

Award2024

Super Lawyers Recognition

Todd Spodek recognized as New York Super Lawyer for Criminal Defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

Spodek Law Group By The Numbers

36
Cases Handled This Year
and counting
15,536+
Total Clients Served
since 2005
95%
Case Success Rate
dismissals & reduced charges
50+
Years Combined Experience
in criminal defense

Data as of February 2026

Todd Spodek in office

Your Future Is Worth Fighting For

50+ years of combined experience defending your rights

Get Advice From An Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer

All You Have To Do Is Call (212) 300-5196 To Receive Your Free Case Evaluation.

CHARGES
DISMISSED

Aggravated Assault

DISMISSED /
DOWNGRADED

DWI

CHARGES
DISMISSED

Drug Possession

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

What Our
Clients Say

"Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive..."

Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive and knowledgeable about my matter. He was available when needed to discuss things. Definitely recommend him to any and everyone!

— Russell H.

MORE REVIEWS
Client consultation
Todd Spodek walking to courthouse
Spodek Law Group office

Watch: Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

45 seconds that explain our difference