New York City Criminal Defense
SEC Defense

SEC Regulations and DeFi: What Every Blockchain Business Needs to Know

5 minutes readSpodek Law Group
FREE CASE EVALUATION

Learn more about Spodek Law Group and how we can help with your case.

SEC Regulations and DeFi: What Every Blockchain Business Needs to Know

Last Updated: 10-22-2025

Regulatory scrutiny of the cryptocurrency ecosystem is rapidly intensifying, and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms have found themselves squarely in the crosshairs of federal enforcement agencies. On multiple occasions, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has made it clear that it views many DeFi projects as operating under its jurisdiction, and that these projects risk lawsuits and civil penalties if they fail to comply with securities laws. While DeFi projects have argued that they are not subject to SEC oversight, the SEC has not been persuaded by their arguments, and the SEC’s enforcement efforts are now ramping up dramatically in 2025.

If you are involved in DeFi, understanding the SEC’s current approach to enforcement is essential for avoiding or efficiently defending against an investigation. DeFi is currently one of the SEC’s top priorities, and the SEC is not showing any signs of letting up. The SEC recently announced the largest corporate settlement in the history of the U.S. cryptocurrency market, and this does not appear to be the end of its efforts to police the market and protect investors.

The SEC Has the Authority to Enforce Federal Securities Laws in the DeFi Market

The first thing DeFi stakeholders need to know is that the SEC has the authority to enforce federal securities laws in the DeFi market. In this way, DeFi projects do not differ from other cryptocurrency projects—and this includes the projects that have been forced to settle with the SEC for hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars in recent years.

The SEC’s authority to enforce federal securities laws is not limited to traditional financial markets. In fact, the SEC has alleged that most initial coin offerings (ICOs) and other cryptocurrency token launches constitute unregistered securities offerings. Under the Howey Test, an investment vehicle constitutes a “security” if it meets the following conditions:

Facing Criminal Charges And Have Questions? We Can Help, Tell Us What Happened.
  • There is an investment of money (or other capital);
  • There is an expectation of profit from the investment;
  • The investment is made in a “common enterprise”; and,
  • Any profit that is earned comes from the owners’ managerial or entrepreneurial efforts.

Applying the Howey Test, the SEC has successfully argued that many token launches and sales constitute unregistered securities offerings. In doing so, the SEC has relied on the fact that purchasers of initial tokens expect the tokens to increase in value, and also on the fact that the tokens are being sold to raise capital for the businesses that are offering them.

The SEC has also sued exchanges for facilitating the trading of unregistered securities, and it has successfully argued that certain types of staking programs and other schemes are subject to its oversight as well. The SEC’s enforcement efforts have not been limited to centralized finance (CeFi) platforms, and it is now turning its focus toward DeFi.

Examples of the SEC’s Enforcement Efforts in DeFi (So Far)

While the SEC’s enforcement efforts in the DeFi space have been limited so far, they have been escalating. To date, the SEC’s efforts appear to be focused on DeFi platforms that facilitate token trading and other investments in unregistered securities. Here are some recent examples of the SEC’s enforcement actions targeting DeFi platforms:

$4 Billion Settlement

The SEC recently announced a large corporate settlement with a DeFi platform—one that the SEC has described as “the largest corporate resolution in the history of the cryptocurrency markets.” In its announcement, the SEC contended that the DeFi platform had not only facilitated unregistered securities trading, but that it had also posed “significant risks to U.S. investors and our financial system.” In addition to facilitating unregistered securities trading in DeFi, the SEC’s allegations also included violating U.S. anti-money laundering (AML) and anti-terrorism financing (ATF) laws.

$1.1 Million Settlement

The SEC also recently announced charges and a settlement with a DeFi platform that the SEC says “operated as an unregistered national securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency.” In addition to agreeing to pay a civil penalty, the DeFi platform also agreed to “permanently shut down the website and . . . destroy its keys to its smart contracts.”

New York City skyline

Legal Pulse: Key Statistics

15,000+Pretrial Diversion

defendants enrolled in NJ pretrial intervention programs annually

Source: NJ PTI Statistics

40%Dismissal Rate

of criminal charges are dismissed or reduced with proper legal representation

Source: NJ Courts Annual Report

Statistics updated regularly based on latest available data

$25.5 Million Settlement

The SEC also recently announced charges and a settlement with a DeFi platform for “offering and selling crypto asset securities in unregistered transactions and for failing to register the offers and sales.” The DeFi platform agreed to pay a $5.5 million civil penalty and $20 million in disgorgement as part of its settlement.

$3.4 Million Settlement

The SEC also announced charges and a settlement with a DeFi platform that was charged with failing to register the offer and sale of its tokens as securities. The DeFi platform agreed to pay a $3.4 million penalty and to destroy its tokens in settlement.

$1 Million Settlement

The SEC also announced charges and a settlement with a DeFi platform for selling unregistered digital tokens. In this case, the DeFi platform agreed to pay a $500,000 civil penalty and to destroy its digital tokens as part of the settlement, and its co-founders agreed to pay a combined total of $500,000 in disgorgement.

New York City Skyline
Free Consultation

Need Help With Your Case?

Don't face criminal charges alone. Our experienced defense attorneys are ready to fight for your rights and freedom.

100% Confidential
Response Within 1 Hour
No Obligation Consultation

Or call us directly:

(212) 300-5196
Todd Spodek
Defense Team Spotlight

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar AdmittedNJ Bar AdmittedFederal Courts
Meet the Full Team

Legal Scenario: What Would You Do?

Attorney Todd Spodek

Scenario

You were arrested and want to know about bail.

How does bail work in NJ?

Attorney's Answer

NJ uses a risk-based system rather than cash bail. A public safety assessment determines release conditions.

This is general information only. Contact us for advice specific to your situation.

50+Years Experience
5,000+Cases Handled
24/7Availability
98%Client Satisfaction
Todd Spodek at courthouse

Recent Wins & Recognition

Media Recognition2022

Netflix's Inventing Anna

Lead attorney Todd Spodek featured in Netflix documentary series as defense counsel.

Client Testimonial2024

Life-Changing Defense

"Todd and his team saved my career. I was facing serious charges and they fought for me every step of the way." - Former Client

Frequently Asked Questions

Spodek Law Group By The Numbers

36
Cases Handled This Year
and counting
15,536+
Total Clients Served
since 2005
95%
Case Success Rate
dismissals & reduced charges
50+
Years Combined Experience
in criminal defense

Data as of February 2026

Todd Spodek in office

Questions About Your Case?

Speak directly with an experienced criminal defense attorney

Get Advice From An Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer

All You Have To Do Is Call (212) 300-5196 To Receive Your Free Case Evaluation.

CHARGES
DISMISSED

Aggravated Assault

DISMISSED /
DOWNGRADED

DWI

CHARGES
DISMISSED

Drug Possession

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

What Our
Clients Say

"Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive..."

Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive and knowledgeable about my matter. He was available when needed to discuss things. Definitely recommend him to any and everyone!

— Russell H.

MORE REVIEWS
Client consultation
Todd Spodek walking to courthouse
Spodek Law Group office

Watch: Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

45 seconds that explain our difference