New York City Criminal Defense
Federal Defense

Suffolk County PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers

7 minutes readSpodek Law Group
FREE CASE EVALUATION

Learn more about Spodek Law Group and how we can help with your case.

Suffolk County PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers

You got a PPP loan back in 2020. Maybe 2021. The government was practically throwing money at businesses during the pandemic - you filled out the application, got approved, used the funds. Years passed. You assumed if there was going to be a problem, it would have happened by now.

You shouldn't have.

The federal government already knows about most PPP fraud. The SBA referred over 669,000 potentially fraudulent loans to the Office of Inspector General for investigation. Congress extended the statute of limitations to 10 years - retroactively. That means a 2020 loan is prosecutable until 2030. You're not hiding from anyone. You're in line. And Suffolk County falls under the Eastern District of New York, one of the busiest federal districts in the country for white-collar prosecution.

Welcome to Spodek Law Group. We handle federal PPP loan fraud defense in Suffolk County and throughout the Eastern District of New York. If you're under investigation, if you've received a letter from SBA OIG, or if federal agents have shown up asking questions - this article explains what you're actually facing and what options might still exist.

You're Not Hiding - You're In Line

In August 2022, President Biden signed the PPP and Bank Fraud Enforcement Harmonization Act. Most people never heard about it. What it actualy did was extend the statute of limitations from 5 years to 10 years - and it applied retroactively.

A PPP loan from 2020 is prosecutable until 2030. A loan from 2021 is prosecutable until 2031. Every single PPP loan ever issued is now subject to potential prosecution for a full decade from the date of the offense.

Heres the part nobody talks about. The SBA used data analytics and manual reviews to flag suspicious loans. They refered over 669,000 loans to the OIG for investigation. These aren't random audits. The algorithm already found the anomalies. If your application had inconsistencies - inflated payroll numbers, questionable employee counts, uses of funds that didn't match the rules - it's probly already in the queue.

The question isn't IF they find you. It's WHEN your file reaches the top of the queue.

Suffolk County residents have already seen this play out. Niall Alli, a Long Island resident, was sentenced to 48 months in federal prison right here in Central Islip - the Suffolk County federal courthouse. He used $1.7 million in PPP funds for Patek Philippe watches, cryptocurrency, and private school tuition. Donna Ingram of Long Island was indicted in May 2024 for a $3.28 million PPP scheme - she submitted 27 fraudulent applications and recieved kickbacks of over $430,000. Damaris Beltre from Freeport faces a 42-count indictment for $12 million in fraud. These are your neighbors.

The Numbers From the Assembly Line

According to Pandemic Oversight, as of December 31, 2024:

  1. 3,096 defendants have been charged with pandemic relief fraud
  2. 2,532 have been found guilty - thats 82%
  3. 1,741 recieved prison time - 81% of those convicted
  4. 2,008 were ordered to pay restitution - 94%
  5. Sentences ranged from 1 day to 30 years, with the majority between 1-5 years

More then 440 defendants were ordered to pay $1 million or more in restitution. The highest restitution amount reached $71 million.

The assembly line is getting faster.

The median time from initial referral to indictment has decreased by 45% compared to 2022-2023. What used to take 8-12 months now takes 4-6 months. The government has figured out how to process these cases more efficently. They're not slowing down. There accelerating.

These aren't just numbers on a page. This is industrial-scale prosecution. And Suffolk County is in EDNY - a district that has been particuarly aggressive with PPP fraud cases.

Facing Criminal Charges And Have Questions? We Can Help, Tell Us What Happened.

Why 2025 Sentences Are Brutal

Early in the pandemic, some federal judges showed leniency. The economic chaos. The desperation businesses faced. The confusing and contradictory guidance about what qualified. Some judges gave probation or minimal prison time for smaller frauds.

Those days are gone.

Defendants sentenced in 2024-2025 are recieving sentences aproximately 40% longer than defendants who committed identical conduct but were sentenced in 2021-2022. Federal judges have lost patience. The "I was confused" defense doesn't work anymore. The "everyone was doing it" defense definitely doesn't work.

Recent sentencing examples from DOJ press releases:

  • Richard Nieto: 46 months for $913,000 (June 2025)
  • Nevada defendant: 15+ years for $11 million (August 2025)
  • Kansas City woman: 51 months for $900,000 (2025)
  • Cincinnati defendant: 18 months for $21,000 (March 2025)

That last one deserves attention. Do people actually go to prison for a $20,000 PPP loan?

Yes.

The amount doesn't protect you. Federal judges in 2025 include prison time in nearly every PPP fraud sentencing regardless of the amount involved. This isn't about proportionality anymore. Its about deterrence. The government wants headlines.

Heres how one application becomes five federal charges:

  1. Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) - up to 30 years
  2. Bank Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344) - up to 30 years
  3. False Statements to SBA (18 U.S.C. § 1014) - up to 30 years
  4. Money Laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956) - up to 20 years
  5. Aggravated Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028A) - mandatory +2 years consecutive

One PPP application can create theoretical exposure exceeding 100 years. In practice, sentences don't reach that level - but charge stacking gives prosecutors enormous leverage in plea negotiations.

Leon Miles in Brooklyn: 72 months federal prison, forfeiture of a 2020 Bentley, restitution of $598,299.39. All from PPP fraud.

What to Do Before They Call

The single most important rule you'll read in this article:

Never agree to discuss a potential PPP fraud case with a federal agent without a lawyer present.

New York City skyline

Legal Pulse: Key Statistics

500+Public Defender Caseload

cases per year handled by average public defender in NJ

Source: NJ OPD Report

25%Trial Success Rate

of cases that go to trial result in acquittal with private counsel

Source: NJ Defense Bar

Statistics updated regularly based on latest available data

This sounds obvious. But there have been several recent cases where people who decided to talk to investigators without counsel ended up being charged with obstruction or making false statements to federal agents - in addition to the underlying PPP fraud. The agents seem friendly. Cooperative. They're not on your side.

Theres another trap most people fall into.

Some people, panicking, decide to voluntarily repay the loan thinking it will make the problem go away. The DOJ has explicitly stated that voluntary repayment can be used as evidence of consciousness of guilt. Returning the money doesn't make it go away - it can actually strengthen the governments case against you.

If your under investigation or concerned you might be:

  • Don't destroy any documents. Document destruction can become a seperate charge.
  • Don't discuss the matter with others who may be involved. Those conversations can be used against you.
  • Don't make voluntary payments to the SBA without counsel. This can be used as consciousness of guilt.
  • Contact a federal defense attorney immediately. The earlier you act, the more options exist.

There's a window most people don't know about. Typically six to twelve months between when SBA OIG flags a loan and when the case gets referred to the FBI for criminal investigation. During this window, a skilled defense attorney may be able to negotiate a civil disposition - repayment plus a fine, maybe a False Claims Act settlement. Not pleasant, but not a federal felony conviction either.

That window disappears once criminal charges are filed.

Todd Spodek has handled PPP fraud cases in the Eastern District of New York. He understands the difference between OIG-stage investigations where civil resolution may be possible, and FBI-stage investigations where criminal defense is the priority. The Central Islip courthouse is familiar territory.

When You're Ready

If you're in Suffolk County - or anywhere on Long Island - and you're facing a PPP loan fraud investigation, Spodek Law Group can help you understand where you stand and what options remain.

The consultation is free. There's no obligation.

What you'll get is an honest assessment. Is this still at the OIG stage where civil resolution might be possible? Has it been referred to the FBI? What does the evidence look like? What are realistic outcomes - not best-case fantasies, but actual possibilities based on how these cases play out in EDNY?

Call us at 888-997-5177. The statute of limitations runs until 2030 or 2031 depending on when you got the loan. The government has time. But once your file reaches the top of that queue, things move fast. The earlier you have counsel, the more leverage exists.

Don't wait until federal agents knock on your door.

We're here when you need us.

New York City Skyline
Free Consultation

Need Help With Your Case?

Don't face criminal charges alone. Our experienced defense attorneys are ready to fight for your rights and freedom.

100% Confidential
Response Within 1 Hour
No Obligation Consultation

Or call us directly:

(888) 997-5177
Todd Spodek
Defense Team Spotlight

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar AdmittedNJ Bar AdmittedFederal Courts
Meet the Full Team

Legal Scenario: What Would You Do?

Attorney Todd Spodek

Scenario

You were arrested and want to know about bail.

How does bail work in NJ?

Attorney's Answer

NJ uses a risk-based system rather than cash bail. A public safety assessment determines release conditions.

This is general information only. Contact us for advice specific to your situation.

50+Years Experience
5,000+Cases Handled
24/7Availability
98%Client Satisfaction
Todd Spodek at courthouse

Recent Wins & Recognition

Media Recognition• 2022

Netflix's Inventing Anna

Lead attorney Todd Spodek featured in Netflix documentary series as defense counsel.

Award• 2024

Avvo Top Attorney

Firm attorneys maintain perfect 10.0 Avvo ratings for criminal defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I talk to police without a lawyer?

You have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. It's generally advisable to politely decline to answer questions and request to speak with your lawyer before making any statements.

How much does a criminal defense attorney cost?

Fees vary based on the complexity of your case, the attorney's experience, and whether your case goes to trial. Many attorneys offer free consultations to discuss your case and fee structure.

What happens at an arraignment?

At arraignment, you're formally charged and enter a plea (usually not guilty initially). Bail may be set. Your attorney will advocate for reasonable bail conditions and begin building your defense.

Spodek Law Group By The Numbers

12
Cases Handled This Year
and counting
15,512+
Total Clients Served
since 2005
95%
Case Success Rate
dismissals & reduced charges
50+
Years Combined Experience
in criminal defense

Data as of January 2026

Todd Spodek in office
Urgent

Just Arrested? We Can Help Now

Our attorneys handle emergency situations around the clock

24/7 emergency line available

Get Advice From An Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer

All You Have To Do Is Call (888) 997-5177 To Receive Your Free Case Evaluation.

CHARGES
DISMISSED

Aggravated Assault

DISMISSED /
DOWNGRADED

DWI

CHARGES
DISMISSED

Drug Possession

*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

What Our
Clients Say

"Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive..."

Mr. Spodek was great. He was very attentive and knowledgeable about my matter. He was available when needed to discuss things. Definitely recommend him to any and everyone!

— Russell H.

MORE REVIEWS
Client consultation
Todd Spodek walking to courthouse
Spodek Law Group office

Watch: Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

45 seconds that explain our difference