Washington PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers

Congress extended the statute of limitations for PPP fraud from five years to ten years in 2022. Most people think that means prosecutors need more time to catch fraudsters. But here's what defense attorneys know that nobody's saying publicly: the ten-year extension is actually a trap that destroys your ability to defend yourself. Every year prosecutors wait to indict you, your evidence disappears - business records get shredded under normal retention policies, employees move on, emails auto-delete, accountants purge files. Meanwhile, the federal government's records stay perfectly preserved. By the time they charge you (often four years after your application), your facing a 97.4% conviction rate armed with nothing but degraded memory against intact federal documentation. The statute extension wasn't designed to help prosecutors be thorough. It was designed to let them wait until you physicaly cannot prove your innocence.

At Spodek Law Group, we represent clients throughout Washington state facing federal PPP loan fraud investigations in both the Western District (Seattle) and the Eastern District (Spokane). What makes Washington unique is that these two districts prosecute completely different types of cases. Western District goes after massive fraud rings stealing millions - people who bought Range Rovers and paid for plastic surgery with pandemic money. Eastern District launched a dedicated COVID-19 Fraud Strike Force that fast-tracks cases, and there hunting down sole proprietors who made $20,000 mistakes on confusing applications. Either way, the playbook is the same: wait years, then indict when your evidence is gone. Our mission is to intervene before that happens - preserving evidence, negotiating civil resolutions, and protecting people who made honest mistakes from prosecutors who treat every error like intentional fraud. Call us at 212-300-5196 if you recieved a PPP loan in Washington and have any concerns about your application or how you used the funds.

The 10-Year Statute Started When You Applied for Forgiveness, Not When You Got the Loan

Most people think the statute of limitations started when they recieved there PPP loan in 2020. Wrong. The ten-year clock starts from your LAST fraudulent act related to that loan. For most borrowers, that wasn't the loan application - it was the forgiveness application you submitted months or even years later. If you applied for a PPP loan in April 2020 but didn't submit your forgiveness application until March 2021, prosecutors have until March 2031 to indict you. Not 2030. That's an extra year most people aren't accounting for.

And here's the irony nobody mentions: getting your loan forgiven felt like relief, like you were done with the whole thing. But that forgiveness application is what started the statute clock running. Every piece of information you put on that form - how many employees you had, what you spent the money on, whether your business was still operating - became potential evidence in a fraud case that might not get filed for another eight or nine years. By that time, do you remember exactly how many full-time equivalent employees you had in Q2 2020? Do you have the payroll records to prove it? Your accountant might've shredded those files in 2027 under there standard seven-year retention policy. But the prosecutor has a perfect copy of your forgiveness application, and when you can't produce records to back it up, the jury hears "defendant destroyed evidence."

Washington defendants are finding this out the hard way. People who thought they were in the clear because it's been four years since there loan - they're getting indicted now, in 2024 and 2025. And prosecutors will keep filing cases through 2031 and 2032 for loans that were forgiven in 2021-2022. The timeline is longer than you think. Which means the evidence decay problem is worse then you think.

The forgiveness application trap is particularly brutal because most people filled it out without a lawyer. The loan application, maybe you had an accountant help. But the forgiveness app felt like a formality - the government said if you used it on payroll, it would be forgiven. So people rushed through it, made mistakes, estimated numbers they couldn't quite remember. And those mistakes are now being prosecuted as wire fraud, with a maximum penalty of thirty years because the application went through a banks electronic system.

Washington's Two Federal Districts Are Prosecuting Completely Different Cases

Washington state has two seperate federal districts, and they might as well be different worlds when it comes to PPP fraud prosecution. The Western District of Washington, based in Seattle, has been going after massive fraud rings - organized schemes involving multiple people stealing millions of dollars. The Eastern District of Washington, based in Spokane, launched a dedicated COVID-19 Fraud Strike Force that's fast-tracking prosecutions of much smaller cases. If you recieved a PPP loan in Washington, which district you end up in can completely change what your facing.

Western District: The Paradise Williams Case

Western District is were Paradise Williams got prosecuted. Williams ran a fraud ring that stole $6.8 million from nearly every major pandemic assistance program - not just PPP, but unemployment benefits, EIDL loans, everything. She personally recieved over two million dollars and spent it on:

• Cosmetic surgery
• A Lexus sedan
• A Range Rover SUV
• Lavish trips
• Jewelry and designer goods

When federal agents raided her place, the evidence was overwhelming. She plead guilty and got sentenced to five years in federal prison. The court ordered her to pay $2.7 million in restitution to the U.S. Treasury and another $512,730 to the Small Business Administration. She had to forfeit $2,023,104 in cash plus both vehicles. Her codefendants - D'Arius Jackson, Tia Robinson, Rayvon Peterson, David Martinez - all entered guilty pleas to. Jackson got three years, Robinson got eighteen months.

That's the Western District playbook: massive conspiracies, multiple defendants, millions of dollars, luxury purchases that make juries angry. These are cases were the government has mountains of evidence - wire transfers, Instagram posts showing off the cars, text messages coordinating the fraud. There's no sympathy for someone who bought a Range Rover with pandemic relief money while actual businesses were failing.

Eastern District: The Antonio Crawford Case

But then you got the Eastern District, and it's a completely different animal. Eastern District set up a COVID-19 Fraud Strike Force - a dedicated team of prosecutors who's entire job is hunting down pandemic fraud in eastern Washington. And there not just going after million-dollar schemes. There looking at sole proprietors, self-employed people, small businesses that might've made mistakes on applications filled out in a panic during an economic crisis.

Antonio Crawford is a perfect example. Crawford lived in Mead, Washington - that's just north of Spokane, right in the Eastern District. He filed PPP and EIDL applications for four different entities:

• Tann LLC
• Crawford Entertainment
• A&M Personal Training LLC
• A sole proprietorship doing business as "Antonio Crawford"

The government said these were fake businesses, that the applications contained false information about payroll and number of employees. Crawford caused a loss of over $750,000 to the pandemic relief programs.

On November 14, 2024, U.S. District Judge Thomas O. Rice sentenced Crawford to forty-five months in federal prison. That's almost four years. The judge also imposed five years of supervised release after prison, restitution of $203,347.08, and forfeiture of $173,329 in cash that agents had seized from Crawford's home during a search. This is what Eastern District prosecution looks like - your not just paying the money back, your going to federal prison and losing everything they can seize.

The contrast is striking. Paradise Williams stole $6.8 million and got five years. Antonio Crawford caused a $750,000 loss and got forty-five months. The difference in dollar amounts is huge, but the prison time is fairly similar. That's because the federal sentencing guidelines for fraud are based on loss amount, but there's also enhancements for things like number of victims, sophisticated means, abuse of trust. And once your past a certain dollar threshold, the increases get smaller. So someone who steals $750,000 isn't getting nine times less prison time than someone who steals $6.8 million - there both in the same ballpark of four to five years.

What this means for Washington defendants: if your in the Western District, prosecutors are focused on big organized fraud rings. If you made an honest mistake or took a loan you were arguably eligible for, you might fly under there radar. But if your in the Eastern District, the Strike Force is specifically hunting for cases just like yours. They have dedicated resources, and there fast-tracking prosecutions. Eastern District defendants are finding out that the governments definition of "fraud" is alot broader than they thought.

Most People Charged in 2024 Applied in 2020 - That's a 4-Year Evidence Death Clock

Here's a pattern defense attorneys are seeing across the country: defendants getting indicted in 2024 for PPP loan applications they submitted in 2020. That's four years between the act and the charge. Four years were your business records got destroyed, your employees quit or moved away, your accountant shredded the files under standard retention policies, your emails auto-deleted. And by the time you get that call from a federal agent or that target letter in the mail, the evidence you need to prove you didn't commit fraud is gone.

The government knows this is happening. There not stupid. Federal prosecutors understand that most businesses have document retention policies - usually five to seven years. They know that emails auto-delete after a certain period. They know that accountants purge old client files. And they know that every month that passes makes your case harder to defend and theres easier to win.

Tyler Andrews is an example from the case records - he committed his fraud between June 2020 and May 2022. He wasn't sentenced until December 2024. That's two and a half years just from his last fraudulent act to sentencing, and probably three to four years from his first act to indictment. Can you remember what you were doing in June 2020? Can you remember how many employees you had, what there names were, what you paid them? Can you prove it without documents?

Most people can't. And that's the evidence death clock in action. The investigation window - the time when federal agents are gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, building the case - typically lasts four to six months. But here's the thing: your living your normal life during that period. You don't know your under investigation. So your company keeps following its normal document retention schedule. Your shredding old payroll records because you legally only have to keep them for a certain number of years. Your email system is auto-deleting messages older than three years. Your accountant is purging there files to make room for new clients.

And then the government shows up and says "we need to see your 2020 payroll records." And you don't have them anymore. They were destroyed in 2023 or 2024 per your company's normal retention policy. Which was perfectly legal when you did it - you weren't under investigation yet. But now that your being charged, the jury's going to hear that you "don't have the records." And what do juries think when a defendant can't produce records? They think your hiding something. They think you destroyed evidence to cover up fraud.

Even if you say "no, we destroyed those records in 2023 as part of our normal seven-year retention cycle," the prosecutor will ask: "But you knew you'd submitted a PPP loan application in 2020. You knew there was a possibility of an audit or investigation. Why didn't you preserve those records?" And you don't have a good answer, because you thought the statute of limitations was five years, and you thought if nobody contacted you by 2025, you were clear. You didn't know Congress had extended it to ten years. You didn't know the clock started from your forgiveness application in 2021, not your loan application in 2020.

This is what defense attorneys mean when they say evidence decay is the real killer in PPP fraud cases. It's not that you did something wrong - it's that you can't prove you did something right. And in a federal criminal trial, were the government has a 97.4% conviction rate in IRS Criminal Investigation prosecuted cases, "I can't remember" and "I don't have the documents" isn't a defense that works.

The 97.4% Conviction Rate Isn't About Guilt - It's About Evidence Decay

Federal prosecutors like to tout there conviction rates. In COVID-19 fraud cases prosecuted by IRS Criminal Investigation, the conviction rate is 97.4%. Some sources cite it as high as 98.5%. That's almost perfect. Out of every 100 defendants, 97 or 98 get convicted. Only two or three walk away.

Most people hear that number and think "well, they must only prosecute really guilty people." That's the intended interpretation. The government wants you to think there so good at catching criminals that they only bring cases there certain to win. And to some extent, that's true - federal prosecutors have the resources to be selective. But here's what defense attorneys know: that 97% conviction rate isn't about guilt. It's about evidence decay and plea leverage.

Think about it this way. If prosecutors wait four years to indict you, and during those four years your evidence self-destructs while there evidence stays perfectly preserved, what are your chances at trial? Your accountant testifies "I shredded the 2020 files in 2023 per our retention policy." Your former employee testifies "I don't really remember how many hours I worked back then." Your bank statements show the deposits and withdrawals but don't explain what each transaction was for. And the prosecutor has your PPP loan application, your bank records showing where the money went, your forgiveness application, your IRS filings - all of it perfectly preserved in federal databases that never purge anything.

Your lawyer tells you: "If we go to trial, your probably going to lose. The jury's going to see that you can't produce records, and there going to interpret that as guilt. The prosecutor's going to argue you destroyed evidence. Your looking at a 97% chance of conviction, and if you get convicted at trial, the judge is going to sentence you to the high end of the guidelines because you didn't accept responsibility. But if you plead guilty now, we can argue for a downward departure based on cooperation, lack of criminal history, good character. You'll still go to prison, but maybe eighteen months instead of forty-five months."

And so you plead guilty. Not because you committed fraud, but because you can't prove you didn't. That's how you get to a 97.4% conviction rate. You charge people who physically cannot mount an effective defense, and you offer them plea deals that are "better than trial." Even innocent people take plea deals when the alternative is a near-certain conviction and a maximum sentence.

And here's the part that should make you angry: eighty-one percent of convicted PPP fraud defendants receive prison time. Not probation. Not home confinement. Not community service. Actual federal prison. The average sentence in IRS-CI prosecuted COVID fraud cases is thirty-one months. That's two years and seven months. Almost three years of your life gone.

Think about what three years means:

• Your kids grow up without you
• Your spouse struggles to pay the bills and might leave
• Your business closes
• Your house goes into foreclosure
• You lose your professional licenses
• When you get out, your a convicted felon with a fraud conviction on your record
• Your unemployable in most industries
• Your life is destroyed

All because you can't produce payroll records from 2020 to prove that your employee count on the PPP application was accurate.

The conviction rate is high because the system is designed to make defense impossible. Wait until evidence decays, then indict. Offer a plea deal that's still terrible but better than the certainty of conviction at trial. Rack up convictions. Claim your tough on fraud. Get promoted. Meanwhile, people who might've made honest mistakes are sitting in federal prison because they couldn't prove there innocence half a decade after the fact.

Gross Receipts vs Net Profit - A Schedule C Mistake Becomes Wire Fraud

Self-employed people are getting absolutely destroyed in PPP fraud prosecutions, and it's often because of one specific mistake: using gross receipts instead of net profit from there Schedule C to calculate the loan amount. This sounds like a tax form confusion issue - maybe something that should result in paying back the overage plus a penalty. But prosecutors are charging it as wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1343, which carries a maximum penalty of twenty years in federal prison, or thirty years if the fraud affects a financial institution. And since every PPP loan went through a bank, prosecutors argue for the thirty-year maximum.

How the Calculation Should Work

Here's how it works. The PPP loan amount for self-employed individuals was supposed to be calculated using your 2019 Schedule C net profit - that's Line 31 on the form. You take that number, divide by twelve to get your monthly net profit, then multiply by 2.5 to get your loan amount. So if your net profit was $80,000, your monthly amount would be $6,666.67, and your PPP loan would be $16,666.67.

But alot of self-employed people used gross receipts instead - that's Line 1 on Schedule C. If your gross receipts were $200,000 but your net profit was only $80,000 (after deducting expenses), and you used the $200,000 number, you would've gotten a loan of $41,666.67. That's a $25,000 overpayment. An honest mistake on a confusing application filled out during a pandemic when the rules were changing every week.

Except prosecutors don't see it as an honest mistake. They see it as wire fraud. And here's were the evidence decay problem makes it worse: four years later, when they indict you, can you prove it was an honest mistake? Can you prove you didn't understand which line to use? Can you produce emails with your accountant were you asked for help and got bad advice? Or did your accountant purge those files already?

The Consequence Cascade

The consequence cascade looks like this:

1. You use gross receipts instead of net profit
2. You recieve a $25,000 overpayment
3. The SBA runs an automated review in 2024 and flags your loan
4. They refer it to the Department of Justice
5. The DOJ assigns a prosecutor who opens a grand jury investigation
6. The prosecutor subpoenas your bank records, your tax returns, your PPP application
7. They see that you used gross receipts, and they charge wire fraud - not civil repayment, criminal prosecution
8. You get indicted
9. Your lawyer tells you that you can't prove it was an honest mistake because your accountant's work files were destroyed, your emails auto-deleted, and you can't remember the details from four years ago
10. You plead guilty to avoid the 97% trial conviction rate
11. The judge sentences you to the average of thirty-one months in federal prison
12. Your self-employed business closes while your incarcerated
13. You lose everything

The gross-versus-net issue is one of the most common triggering factors for PPP fraud investigations of self-employed individuals. And it's brutal because the mistake is understandable - Schedule C is confusing, the instructions weren't clear, the pandemic was chaos, people were panicking about there businesses surviving. But prosecutors treat it like intentional fraud. And without evidence to prove it was a mistake (emails, contemporaneous notes, accountant testimony), you can't defend yourself.

What makes this particularly unfair is that the SBA's own guidance was confusing. Different lenders interpreted the rules differently. Some accountants gave bad advice. The rules changed multiple times during the application period. People were trying to comply in good faith, and many made errors not because they were trying to steal money, but because they didn't understand a complicated formula on a government form they'd never seen before.

But four years later, when you can't produce the evidence showing you tried to get it right, the prosecutor's narrative is simple: "You lied on a federal application to get money you weren't entitled to. That's fraud." And the jury believes it, because you don't have the documents to tell your side of the story.

Cooperating Without a Lawyer Is How Civil Cases Become Criminal Charges

Federal agents investigating PPP fraud will often reach out directly to targets - a phone call, an unexpected visit to your home or business, a letter asking you to come in for an interview. And they'll use language designed to make you cooperate: "We just want to clear some things up." "We're talking to everyone who received a PPP loan." "If you cooperate now, it'll go better for you." "Your not a target, we just need information."

Everything about this is designed to make you talk without a lawyer. And talking without a lawyer is how potential civil cases (where you just pay the money back plus a penalty) become criminal cases (where your facing federal prison). Because if you misremember a single detail from four years ago - if you get a date wrong by two months, if you misstate how many employees you had, if you estimate a dollar amount that turns out to be off - you've just committed a new crime: making a false statement to a federal agent, 18 U.S.C. 1001, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

How the Cooperation Trap Works

The cooperation trap works like this. An FBI or IRS Criminal Investigation agent calls and says there investigating your PPP loan. They want to talk. You think "I didn't do anything wrong, I'll just explain what happened." You agree to meet without consulting a lawyer because you think lawyers are expensive and you don't need one if your innocent. The agent asks questions:

• Agent: "How many employees did you have in March 2020?"
• You: "I think it was twelve."
• Problem: Your application said fifteen.

• Agent: "What did you use the PPP money for?"
• You: "Payroll, mostly."
• Problem: Your bank records show large transfers to your personal account.
• You: "Oh, I reimburse myself for business expenses I'd paid personally"
• Problem: Now your story is getting complicated and the agent is writing everything down.

Three months later, you get indicted. The charges: wire fraud (18 U.S.C. 1343) for the PPP application, and making false statements to a federal agent (18 U.S.C. 1001) for what you said in the interview. The wire fraud charge was always a possibility. But the false statement charge? You created that by talking. And now you've got compound charges, which destroys your plea leverage. Prosecutors are way less likely to offer a civil resolution when your facing multiple federal felonies. You've made your situation objectively worse by cooperating.

This is the paradox defense attorneys see constantly: federal agents tell you cooperation helps, and in some contexts it does - but cooperating without a lawyer when you don't know what evidence they already have is how people turn misdemeanor-level mistakes into felony prosecutions. Because you don't know what there testing you on. You don't know what documents they've already reviewed, what witnesses they've already interviewed, what story there expecting to hear. Your answering questions blind, and every answer is a potential false statement charge if it doesn't match the evidence they've already gathered.

Even if you didn't commit fraud on your PPP application, you can get convicted of making false statements to the agent who interviewed you about it. And that conviction can carry five years. And once your convicted of lying to federal agents, good luck convincing a jury your PPP application was honest. The prosecutor will argue: "The defendant lied to investigators, which shows consciousness of guilt. If the loan application was legitimate, why did the defendant lie about it?" Your lawyer will object that your 1001 conviction was based on misremembering details, not intentional deception, but the damage is done.

Here's what prosecutors know but don't say: people cannot accurately remember details from four years ago. Especially business details like exact employee counts, specific dates, dollar amounts. Normal memory decay means you'll get things wrong. And if you get things wrong while talking to a federal agent, that's a crime. They're setting you up to fail.

The Correct Response

The correct response when a federal agent contacts you about a PPP loan is: "I'm happy to cooperate, but I need to consult with my attorney first. Please provide your contact information and I'll have my lawyer reach out." Then you call a federal defense lawyer immediately. The lawyer will contact the agent, find out what there investigating, review the evidence with you, and determine whether cooperation makes sense. Sometimes it does - if you've got exculpatory evidence, if you can provide information about someone else's fraud, if there's a clear misunderstanding that can be resolved. But you make that decision strategically, with full knowledge of what the government knows, not blindly in response to a surprise phone call.

The 2029-2030 Indictment Surge Nobody's Talking About

Most PPP loans were disbursed in 2020 and 2021. Most forgiveness applications were submitted in 2021 and 2022. The statute of limitations is ten years from the last fraudulent act - which for most people is the forgiveness application. That means the statute expires in 2031 and 2032 for the vast majority of PPP loans. And historically, what do prosecutors do as statutes of limitations approach? They rush to file cases before the deadline.

We're going to see a massive surge of PPP fraud indictments in 2029 and early 2030. Prosecutors who have been sitting on investigations, building cases, waiting for the right moment - there all going to file right before the statute runs. And that timing is catastrophic for defendants, because it's the worst possible moment in terms of evidence decay. Nine or ten years after your application, after your forgiveness request, can you prove anything? Can you produce any records? Can you even remember what business you were running in 2020?

The Scale of Ongoing Enforcement

The Department of Justice has made clear that pandemic fraud prosecutions will continue through at least 2030. They've got over 700 active investigations right now, and there adding more every month. As of December 31, 2024, U.S. Attorneys' Offices had criminally charged approximatly 3,096 defendants in PPP and pandemic fraud cases. That sounds like alot, but it's a tiny fraction of the 130,000+ loans that have been flagged as potentially fraudulent.

The Small Business Administration Office of Inspector General flagged 669,000 potentially fraudulent loans through automated screening. The Government Accountability Office identified warning signs in 3.7 million out of 11.5 million PPP loan recipients.

Do the math. If there's 669,000 flagged loans and only 3,096 people have been charged so far, were not even at one percent of potential prosecutions. The government has barely started. And they've got until 2031-2032 to work through the rest.

What this means: if you received a PPP loan in Washington, even if it's been four or five years without any contact from the government, your not in the clear. Your in the danger zone. The next five years are when the bulk of prosecutions will happen. And the closer we get to 2030, the worse your evidence situation becomes.

Prosecutors know exactly what there doing. They know that waiting until 2029 to indict someone for a 2020 loan application is strategic. They know your records are gone. They know your memory is unreliable. They know your employees have scattered. They know your accountant has moved on. They know your in the worst possible position to defend yourself. And that's when they strike.

The 2029-2030 surge is going to catch alot of people off guard. People who thought "well, it's been five years, I guess I'm okay." People who didn't know the statute was extended to ten years. People who didn't know the clock started from the forgiveness application. People who destroyed records under normal retention policies because they thought the legal risk had passed. All of them are going to get indictments right before the statute expires, and none of them will have the evidence to defend themselves.

This is why acting now matters. If your a Washington resident who received a PPP loan, and you have any concerns about your application - whether you used the funds correctly, whether you were actually eligible, whether you made mistakes on the forms - you need to consult with a federal defense attorney now. Not in 2029 when you get indicted. Now, while evidence still exists, while memories are still relatively fresh, while there's still time to negotiate a civil resolution before criminal charges get filed.

What You Need to Do Right Now If You Received a PPP Loan in Washington

If you received a PPP loan in Washington state - whether your in Seattle, Spokane, Tacoma, Vancouver, or anywhere else - and you have any concerns about your application, your use of funds, or your eligibility, here's what you need to do immediately.

1. Preserve Every Document

First: preserve every document related to your PPP loan. And I mean everything:

• Your loan application
• Your forgiveness application
• Payroll records from 2019, 2020, 2021
• Bank statements showing where the money went
• Tax returns
• Emails with your accountant or bookkeeper
• Text messages about the business
• IRS filings
• State business registrations
• Anything that could possibly be relevant to proving your loan was legitimate

Do not follow your normal document retention schedule for these files. Do not let your email system auto-delete them. Do not let your accountant shred them. Make multiple backups - digital and physical. Because if you get indicted in 2028 or 2029, these documents are the only thing standing between you and federal prison.

2. Don't Talk to Federal Agents Without a Lawyer

Second: if a federal agent contacts you - FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, SBA Office of Inspector General, anyone - do not talk to them without a lawyer. I don't care how friendly they are. I don't care how much they insist your not a target. I don't care if they say cooperation will help. You say: "I'm happy to cooperate through my attorney. Please provide your contact information." Then you call a federal defense lawyer before you say another word. You cannot talk your way out of a federal investigation, but you absolutely can talk your way into additional charges.

3. Consider Proactive Resolution

Third: if you think you made a mistake on your application - if you used gross receipts instead of net profit, if you overstated your employee count, if you used the funds on something that maybe wasn't allowed - talk to a federal defense attorney about proactive resolution. Sometimes it's possible to approach the SBA or the DOJ before charges are filed and work out a civil settlement: you pay back the overage, you pay a penalty, but you avoid criminal prosecution. This only works if you act early, before there's an indictment. Once your criminally charged, the civil resolution window is usually closed.

4. Understand District Differences

Fourth: understand that the Eastern District and Western District of Washington prosecute differently. If your in Eastern Washington (Spokane, Kennewick, Walla Walla, Wenatchee, Yakima), your dealing with the COVID-19 Fraud Strike Force, which means dedicated prosecutors who are actively hunting for cases. If your in Western Washington (Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Bellingham, Vancouver), your dealing with a U.S. Attorney's Office that focuses on larger fraud rings but still prosecutes individual cases. Either way, you need representation that understands federal court in Washington and has relationships with these prosecutors.

5. Don't Assume the Statute Has Run

Fifth: don't assume the statute of limitations has run. It hasn't. If you got your loan forgiven in 2021, prosecutors have until 2031. If forgiveness happened in 2022, they've got until 2032. That's years away. And as we get closer to those deadlines, the pace of indictments is going to accelerate. The time to act is now, while you still have evidence, while you can still remember details, while there's still a possibility of resolving this without criminal charges.

How Spodek Law Group Can Help

At Spodek Law Group, we've represented clients nationwide in PPP fraud investigations, and we understand the Washington federal districts. We know the prosecutors in the Eastern District Strike Force. We know how Western District handles these cases. We know what evidence the government looks for, what defenses actually work, and when civil resolution is possible. Our approach is to intervene early - before indictment if possible - to preserve your rights, protect your evidence, and negotiate the best possible outcome. Whether that's a civil settlement, a declination of prosecution, a favorable plea agreement, or trial defense, we fight for every client like there future depends on it. Because it does.

The founder of our firm, Todd Spodek, built this practice on the principle that everyone deserves a defense, especially people who made honest mistakes during a chaotic time and are now being treated like criminals. We don't judge. We defend. And we've seen too many cases were people waited until it was too late - until the indictment came down, until the evidence was gone, until the only option was pleading guilty and going to prison. Don't let that be you.

If you received a PPP loan in Washington and you have any concerns - even if you think it's probably nothing, even if your not sure whether you did anything wrong - call us at 212-300-5196. Consultations are confidential. We'll review your situation, tell you honestly what risk your facing, and lay out your options. The statute of limitations is still running. The evidence is still degrading. The investigation surge is coming. The time to act is now.