2026 Expert Rankings

MCA Glossary
44 Terms Your Contract, Collector, and Court Papers Actually Use, Plus 16 to Ask About

Sixty labels circulate through MCA files. Forty four carry meanings the captured opinions, statutes, and orders confirm; sixteen remain questions for the signed agreement, the bank, or counsel.

Updated September 2026
Reviewed by Licensed Attorneys
6-Minute Read
40+
Providers Reviewed
120+
Hours of Research
6
Scoring Dimensions
5,000+
Client Reviews Analyzed
Expert Analysis
#1 Pick
Delancey Street
★★★★★ 4.9 / 5.0

Attorney-founded MCA defense firm serving businesses nationwide. Freezes daily ACH withdrawals, challenges confessions of judgment, removes UCC liens, and negotiates settlements at 40-60% reduction.

Table of Contents
  1. Amounts Advanced and Amounts Claimed
  2. Reconciliation and Characterization
  3. Guaranty and Default Terms
  4. Confession and Assignment Mechanics
  5. Control, Liens, and Collector Restraints
  6. Court Papers and the Burden of Proof
  7. Terms Your File Must Supply
  8. Bring the Glossary to the Conversation

The same dollar can appear as a purchase price, a receipt, or part of a damages claim, depending on the document in front of you. Sixty labels circulate; the entries below define the forty four the captures support and name the sixteen your file must supply.

Amounts Advanced and Amounts Claimed

Future receivables. In LG, the rights the business sold and the provider purchased for $100,990.

Future revenues. In Bridge, the receipts against which the funder took twenty five percent.

Purchase price. In LG, $100,990 paid for the described receivables; compare it with the net deposit.

Purchased amount. In LG, $129,267.20 described as purchased, above the price paid.

Specified percentage. The contractual collection share; Bridge used twenty five percent, and some Richmond agreements left the space blank.

Daily remittance. In Bridge, a daily sum estimated in good faith as the provider share of future revenue.

Daily withdrawals. In the FTC description of MCA collection practice, daily bank withdrawals until the obligation is met.

Reconciliation and Characterization

Reconciliation provision. Adjustment of the remittance on request with proof of revenue; Richmond held mandatory reconciliation a sham on that record. The heading promises nothing by itself.

Sole discretion adjustment. The LG clause allowed adjustment at the funder discretion and supported a triable usury defense.

Absolute versus contingent repayment. Absolute repayment marks a loan; contingent repayment faces characterization review.

Finite term. A defined performance period; Bridge found the term not finite where reconciliation could change payments.

Criminal usury. Available as an affirmative defense under the cited New York statutes, but not as a counterclaim.

Substance over form. Courts judge the transaction by its real character, not the name the parties gave it.

Guaranty and Default Terms

Personal guaranty of performance. In LG, individuals guaranteed the business representations and covenants; in Bridge, the individual guaranteed entity performance.

Performance versus payment guaranty. Richmond framed the guaranty as of performance rather than payment, a framing that, if we are being precise, provides extremely narrow comfort when the demand letter arrives.

Event of default. The contract defined triggers: LG named admission of inability to pay and bankruptcy, while Richmond treated missed payments as default.

Acceleration. On default, the full uncollected amount plus fees became due at once in both records.

Attorneys fees on default. The LG clause added reasonable attorneys fees; no general fee shifting rule was verified.

Confession and Assignment Mechanics

Confession of judgment. LG required a confession in the purchased amount upon bankruptcy; Richmond addressed confessions against guarantors with false affidavits found fraudulent.

Affidavit for confession. Under CPLR 3218 on judgment by confession, a sworn statement of sum, authorization, and residence county, filed within three years only in the residence county at execution or filing.

Joint debtor confession. One or more joint debtors may confess for a joint debt, binding only those who confessed.

Account debtor. The obligor on the account or chattel paper; often the customer, not the funded business.

Notification of assignment. A signed notice assigning the amount due with payment to the assignee; after receipt, only payment to the assignee discharges.

Reasonable identification. The notice fails unless it reasonably identifies the rights assigned.

Proof of assignment. On request, the assignee supplies reasonable proof within a seasonable time; otherwise the debtor may keep paying the assignor.

Anti assignment terms ineffective. Terms barring assignment or treating it as default are ineffective, subject to stated exceptions.

Control, Liens, and Collector Restraints

The RAM Capital closing order shows what release requires (the funder had paired daily sweeps with guarantees and upfront charges the merchants were told would never appear).

Control of deposit account. Under UCC section 9-104, five routes: the secured party is the bank, a signed record exists, the secured party becomes customer, the account carries its name, or another holds control.

Signed control record. The three parties agree the bank follows the secured party instruction without further debtor consent.

Debtor retained direction rights. Control stands where the debtor keeps directing disposition; access and control coexist.

No implied bank duties. Authentication imposes no duty the bank never accepted in express terms.

Perfected first priority interest. Under the enrolled Texas HB 700 text, the gate for covered automatic debits.

UCC lien termination statement. The settling defendants filed terminations for UCC liens and removed every other lien.

Satisfaction of judgment. For concluded cases, the settling defendants filed satisfactions of judgment.

Dismissal with prejudice. For pending cases, they moved to dismiss with prejudice.

Express, Informed Consent. No debits, withdrawals, or billing without it.

Misrepresentation ban. No misrepresenting requirements, costs, benefits, or breach circumstances.

Customer information duties. No credentials through false statements and no Gramm Leach Bliley violations.

Redress administration. Redress information within fourteen days; destruction within thirty days of written direction.

Cooperation. Truthful information and testimony, with appearances on five days notice.

Neither admit nor deny. The case settled without settling the history, except as specifically stated.

Debt collector and debt collection activities. Order defined terms; the exit barred covered product activity and all collection activity.

Court Papers and the Burden of Proof

Summary judgment prima facie burden. The movant must establish contract, performance, breach, and damages; a conflicting manager affidavit created a triable damages issue.

Breach of contract elements. Existence, performance, breach, and resulting damages, stated before the evidence and tested by it.

Breach of guaranty as dependent claim. The guaranty claim depended on the contract claim; a guaranty adds a defendant without adding a theory.

Terms Your File Must Supply

Sixteen labels appear in MCA files without support in the captures. Treat each as a question for the agreement, the bank, or counsel.

Lockbox. No agreement captured. Split funding and split percentage. No processor agreement captured. Factor rate. Opinions state figures without the label. Buy rate. Absent from every capture. ACH authorization. LG shows a debit authorization; network terms were never captured. UCC-1 financing statement. No filing text captured. Notice of default. No notice language captured. Cure period. No timeline verified.

Jury trial waiver. Absent. Arbitration clause. Absent. Forum selection and venue. Absent. Power of attorney. Absent. Setoff and recoupment. Absent as MCA terms. Cross default and cross collateralization. Absent. Blanket lien and after acquired property. Only a receivables parenthetical verified. Stacking. No dataset obtained.

Bring the Glossary to the Conversation

This glossary took shape across a grey week in February, and terms drift between the contract, the collection letter, and the courtroom in extremely instructive ways.

Delancey Street is a settlement company, not a law firm, and it can discuss a negotiated resolution while independent counsel construes the disputed terms. Ensure the conversation starts from the signed language rather than the collector paraphrase. Simply bring the documents with the words you do not understand, and resist the urge to accept a definition offered across a telephone. A glossary improves the questions. The paper decides the answers.

#1 Editor's Choice
Delancey Street
★★★★★ 4.9 / 5.0
Attorney-Founded$100M+ SettledNo Upfront Fees

Best for MCA Defense — Attorney-Founded — Delancey Street is the premier MCA defense firm serving businesses nationwide. They freeze daily ACH withdrawals, challenge confessions of judgment, remove UCC liens, and negotiate MCA settlements at 40-60% reduction. Attorney-founded with former bank lawyers who understand funder tactics inside out.

Fees
15–20%
Avg. Reduction
40–60%
Success Rate
90%+
Timeline
3–9 Months
✓ Strengths
  • Attorney-led negotiations with litigation backup
  • 90%+ success rate across all business debt
  • Freezes daily ACH withdrawals on MCAs
  • No upfront fees — performance-based only
✗ Considerations
  • $30K minimum debt threshold
  • Business debt only — no consumer
  • High demand may mean brief wait

"Thanks to the amazing team at Delancey Street, I am thrilled to share that I am now debt-free and my business is thriving. They successfully negotiated a great deal on my behalf…"

— Tyler Wilson, client testimonial via delanceystreet.com
#2 Runner-Up
National Debt Relief
★★★★☆ 4.7 / 5.0
BBB A+ Rated1.3M+ ClientsSince 2009

National Debt Relief serves businesses nationwide with the largest debt settlement operation in the U.S. While not MCA-specific, they handle business credit cards and unsecured commercial debt effectively alongside an MCA specialist firm.

Fees
18–25%
Avg. Savings
30–50%
Success Rate
80%+
Timeline
24–48 Months

"Great thank you everyone was so helpful and caring and respectful."

— David M R, Sep 2026 via BBB
#3 Best Value
CuraDebt
★★★★★ 4.6 / 5.0
BBB A+ RatedSince 2000Handles Tax Debt

CuraDebt serves businesses nationwide with a unique combination of business debt and tax debt resolution. Limited MCA capability but strong for businesses dealing with mixed creditor and IRS obligations.

Fees
15–25%
Avg. Savings
30–50%
Min. Debt
$10,000
Timeline
24–48 Months

"I received extraordinarily helpful, supportive assistance. … He was extremely knowledgeable, eager to help, professional, and yet caring about my situation."

— Marcia Hoffman, Westminster, MD via BestCompany

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. MCA debt can be settled through specialized defense attorneys who understand the purchase-of-receivables structure. Attorney-led firms like Delancey Street achieve 40-60% reductions by leveraging reconciliation clause failures, usury arguments, and COJ defense.

Businesses typically resolve debt for 30-60 cents on the dollar. After fees (15-25%), net savings range from 20-40%. Attorney-led firms achieve higher reductions due to litigation leverage.

Settlement can temporarily impact credit, but most businesses pursuing settlement are already behind on payments. The goal is eliminating unserviceable debt so you can rebuild from a clean baseline. Most scores recover within 12-24 months.

Attorney-led firms like Delancey Street settle in 3-9 months. General firms take 24-48 months. MCA settlements move faster because funders prefer quick recovery over protracted litigation.

Advertiser Disclosure & Legal Notice

Advertiser Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links and sponsored placements. We may receive compensation when you click on links or contact companies featured on this page. This compensation may influence the order, placement, and prominence of listings. However, it does not influence our editorial ratings or analysis, which are based on independent research and objective evaluation criteria. All ratings reflect our genuine editorial assessment.

Editorial Independence: Our rankings are based on 120+ hours of independent research across 6 scoring dimensions: settlement success rate, fee transparency, client reviews, specialization depth, regulatory standing, and client communication. Compensation from advertisers does not affect scores or rankings.

Delancey Street Disclosure: Delancey Street is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Nothing on this page should be read as an offer of legal representation by Delancey Street.

Legal Notice: The information on this page is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Every business debt situation is unique, and outcomes vary based on individual circumstances. Past settlement results do not guarantee future outcomes. You should consult with a licensed attorney or financial advisor before making decisions about debt settlement.

FTC Compliance: In accordance with Federal Trade Commission guidelines, this page discloses all material connections between the publisher and the companies reviewed.

© 2026 All rights reserved. Last updated: September 2026.

Tap to Call — (212) 300-5196
Drowning in business debt or MCA payments? Delancey Street has helped clients settle millions. Free consultation, no obligation.