Baltimore PPP Fraud Defense Lawyers So your probably freaking out right now because the feds…
Service Oriented Law Firm
WE'RE A BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM.
Over 50 Years Experience
TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
Multiple Offices
WE SERVICE CLIENTS NATIONWIDE.
WE'RE A BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM.
TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
WE SERVICE CLIENTS NATIONWIDE.







So your probably thinking you can’t possibly go to prison because you didn’t personally fill out that PPP application or didn’t know the information was false. Maybe your accountant handled everything and you just signed where they told you. Or maybe your business partner submitted the application without telling you the real details. Look, we get it. Your desperately hoping that lack of knowledge will protect you from federal prison. But here’s the devastating truth – people are going to FEDERAL PRISON for PPP fraud they claim they didn’t know about, and “I didn’t know” is failing as a defense!
The government CLAIMS they need to prove intent, but look at what’s actually happening in courtrooms! Prosecutors are getting convictions by arguing that you SHOULD HAVE KNOWN the information was false. They say signing federal loan documents without reading them shows “willful blindness” – which legally equals intent!
The Department of Justice is using the “ostrich defense” doctrine – if you deliberately avoided learning the truth by not asking questions or reviewing documents, that’s treated as knowing fraud! Stuck your head in the sand? That’s the same as intentional lying in the government’s eyes!
Recent 2025 cases are terrifying! A business owner who let his accountant handle everything? Convicted – 18 months in prison! A wife who signed PPP documents her husband prepared? Convicted – 12 months! They all claimed they didn’t know, but judges said signing without verifying equals fraud!
Blaming your accountant or lawyer is NOT saving people from prison! The government’s position is brutal – YOU are responsible for everything submitted in YOUR name, regardless of who prepared it. You signed the application under penalty of perjury. That signature makes you criminally liable!
Courts are consistently ruling that relying on professionals doesn’t eliminate your responsibility. One defendant just got 2 years in federal prison even though his CPA prepared everything! The judge said “you can’t delegate criminal responsibility to your accountant.” Your signature, your crime, your prison sentence!
The Criminal Division’s Fraud Section specifically targets this defense. They argue that business owners are sophisticated enough to know when numbers don’t make sense. If your company had 5 employees but the application said 15, they say you HAD to know that was wrong!
Business partners lying to you is barely helping defendants! Courts are saying if you’re a partial owner or officer, you have a DUTY to know what’s being submitted for your business. Ignorance of your partner’s fraud isn’t innocence – its negligence that still results in conviction!
We’re seeing devastating cases where innocent partners are going to prison! A silent partner who owned 20% of a business and never saw the PPP application? Convicted! A minority owner who trusted the majority owner? Prison! The government says ownership equals responsibility, period!
Even if your partner forged your signature or submitted applications without your knowledge, you can still be prosecuted if you benefited from the fraud! Got distributions from PPP funds? Kept your salary while the business used PPP money? The government says you’re guilty of conspiracy even without knowledge!
The government is prosecuting “honest mistakes” as intentional fraud! Miscalculated your payroll? They say no legitimate business owner makes that mistake. Misunderstood employee classifications? They argue you should have known better. Confused about eligibility requirements? Too bad – ignorance of the law is no excuse!
The SBA Office of Inspector General takes the position that there are NO innocent mistakes on federal loan applications. Every error is potential fraud. They point to the certification you signed saying “I understand that knowingly making a false statement to obtain a guaranteed loan from SBA is punishable.”
Prosecutors love to show juries the application language: “I understand that knowingly making a false statement to obtain a guaranteed loan from SBA is punishable under the law.” They argue that signing this means you verified everything was true. Any falsity after that signature becomes criminal fraud!
The government infers knowledge from circumstances! Did you receive bank statements showing PPP deposits? That’s knowledge! Did you sign tax returns with different numbers than the PPP application? That proves you knew the truth! Did you benefit from the funds? Consciousness of guilt!
They subpoena your emails, texts, and phone records looking for ANY indication you discussed the loan. One text saying “got the PPP!” can be spun as knowledge of the application. Depositing the funds? Proof you knew about it. Using the money? Evidence of participation in fraud!
The IRS Criminal Investigation division is particularly brutal about inferring knowledge. They compare every document you’ve ever signed – tax returns, bank applications, insurance forms – looking for inconsistencies with your PPP application. Different employee counts on different documents? They say you MUST have known the PPP application was false!
Willful blindness is the prosecutors’ favorite tool to convict people who claim ignorance! It means you deliberately avoided learning the truth. Didn’t read the application before signing? Willful blindness! Didn’t ask questions about suspicious numbers? Willful blindness! Didn’t verify information? Willful blindness equals guilt!
Courts have ruled that willful blindness satisfies the intent requirement for fraud! You don’t need actual knowledge – just deliberate ignorance. One judge recently said “choosing not to know is the same as knowing” and sentenced a defendant to 3 years for PPP fraud he claimed not to know about!
Red flags you ignored become evidence of willful blindness. Payroll numbers that seemed high? Should have investigated. Employees you didn’t recognize? Should have asked. Loan amount larger than expected? Should have questioned it. Every red flag you ignored becomes proof of criminal intent!
Good faith reliance on professionals is a defense IN THEORY but failing IN PRACTICE! To succeed, you must prove: Complete disclosure to your advisor of all facts. Reasonable reliance on their expertise. No red flags you ignored. Full cooperation with investigation. Most defendants can’t meet all these requirements!
Even when defendants prove good faith reliance, judges are giving prison time anyway! One defendant proved his attorney filled out everything wrong – still got 6 months! Another showed his accountant made all the errors – 8 months in prison! Judges say good faith might reduce sentences but doesn’t eliminate them!
The Department of Justice argues that good faith reliance requires REASONABLE reliance. If the numbers were obviously wrong, reliance wasn’t reasonable. If you never asked questions, that’s not good faith. If you benefited from fraud, good faith is irrelevant!
Being “just an employee” who signed documents is still resulting in prison! Office managers who signed as authorized representatives? Prosecuted! HR directors who certified employee counts? Convicted! CFOs who signed based on owner’s instructions? Federal prison!
The government’s theory is simple – if you signed, you’re liable. Doesn’t matter if the owner ordered you. Doesn’t matter if you’d lose your job for refusing. Doesn’t matter if you trusted your boss. Your signature makes you a co-conspirator!
We’re seeing employees getting longer sentences than owners because they “should have known better”! A bookkeeper with 20 years experience can’t claim ignorance about false payroll numbers. An HR manager can’t pretend not to know employee counts. Professional employees are held to higher standards!
People claiming lack of knowledge are STILL getting serious prison time! Recent 2025 sentences for defendants who claimed ignorance: Business owner who trusted accountant – 24 months. Wife who signed husband’s documents – 18 months. Partner who didn’t review application – 30 months. Employee who followed orders – 12 months!
These aren’t reduced sentences for lack of knowledge – they’re standard sentences despite claiming ignorance! Judges are saying “willful blindness is as culpable as actual knowledge” and imposing full guidelines sentences. Your ignorance defense might not even reduce your sentence!
A Marietta man just got convicted for $9.6 million in PPP fraud and faces 170 YEARS even though he claims partners deceived him! The jury didn’t believe his ignorance defense. Juries are unsympathetic to business owners who claim not to know about their own loan applications!
URGENT: “I didn’t know” is FAILING as a defense!
Willful blindness = criminal intent = FEDERAL PRISON!
Call 212-300-5196 NOW before your ignorance becomes evidence!
Look, we need you to understand the harsh reality – claiming you didn’t know about PPP fraud is NOT keeping people out of prison. The government is successfully prosecuting people who signed documents without reading them, trusted professionals who lied, and relied on partners who deceived them. Willful blindness doctrine means deliberately not knowing equals criminal intent.
Courts are rejecting ignorance defenses left and right. Good faith reliance isn’t working. Blaming accountants isn’t helping. Being deceived by partners isn’t preventing conviction. The government argues that signing federal loan documents creates absolute responsibility regardless of actual knowledge.
Your only hope is mounting a sophisticated defense that goes beyond simple ignorance. You need to prove genuine good faith, reasonable reliance, and absence of red flags – and even then you might just get a reduced sentence rather than acquittal. Don’t assume lack of knowledge will save you. Call us immediately at 212-300-5196 and let us build a defense that actually works, because “I didn’t know” is failing in federal court!

Very diligent, organized associates; got my case dismissed. Hard working attorneys who can put up with your anxiousness. I was accused of robbing a gemstone dealer. Definitely A law group that lays out all possible options and best alternative routes. Recommended for sure.
- ROBIN, GUN CHARGES ROBIN
NJ CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS