Free Consultations & We're Available 24/7
WE'RE A BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM.
TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
WE SERVICE CLIENTS NATIONWIDE.
So your probably wondering how much power prosecutors actually have in that grand jury room, or maybe your shocked to learn they basically run the entire show without any oversight, or worse – you just discovered the person trying to indict you also serves as the grand jury’s legal advisor. Maybe you think grand juries are independent bodies. Maybe your hoping prosecutors have limited influence. Or maybe you believe someone supervises what prosecutors do in there. Look, let me tell you something – your desperately trying to understand who’s really in charge of deciding your fate. But heres the TERRIFYING truth – prosecutors have TOTAL control over grand jury proceedings, serving simultaneously as prosecutor, judge, legal advisor, and gatekeeper of all information, with zero oversight or opposition according to Department of Justice guidelines that give them unlimited power!
Let me tell you exactly what prosecutors do in grand jury proceedings – EVERYTHING. They decide what charges to pursue, which witnesses to call, what order to present evidence, what questions to ask, what law to explain, what documents to show. They are director, producer, and star of a show where your liberty is at stake.
The prosecutor literally runs the entire process from start to finish. They open proceedings, present there case, question every witness, explain every law, interpret every document, guide every deliberation. There’s no judge to supervise them. There’s no defense attorney to challenge them. There’s no one to question there methods. They have absolute power.
This isn’t some minor administrative role – prosecutors are the ONLY legal experts in that room. Those 16-23 grand jurors? Regular citizens who know nothing about law. They depend completely on prosecutors to explain everything. Its like having the fox not just guard the henhouse but also teach the hens about security.
The Department of Justice’s own manual admits prosecutors “present evidence” and “advise on law” but that’s like saying a dictator “influences policy.” The reality is prosecutors control every single aspect of grand jury proceedings without any check on there power. They are judge, jury, and executioner of the investigation phase.
Here’s the most insane part – the same prosecutor trying to get you indicted also serves as the grand jury’s legal advisor! When grand jurors have questions about law, they ask the prosecutor. When they need clarification on charges, they ask the prosecutor. When they want to understand evidence, they ask the prosecutor. The person whose job is getting indictments is the only source of legal knowledge.
This creates an impossible conflict of interest. How can prosecutors fairly advise grand jurors when there goal is indictment? Its like asking a salesman if you should buy his product – of course he’ll say yes! But somehow this is perfectly legal and standard practice in every grand jury proceeding.
Grand jurors don’t know they’re getting one-sided legal advice. They think prosecutors are neutral legal experts helping them understand complex law. They don’t realize every explanation is crafted to achieve indictment. The “advice” is actually advocacy disguised as education.
Prosecutors have 100% control over what evidence grand juries see and hear. They decide which witnesses testify, which documents get presented, which exhibits get shown. Grand jurors only know what prosecutors want them to know. Its information dictatorship.
Even worse, prosecutors have NO obligation to present exculpatory evidence that might help you! The Supreme Court ruled prosecutors can present only incriminating evidence while hiding everything favorable. They can literally conceal proof of innocence from grand jurors. How is that justice?
While DOJ guidelines say prosecutors should be “scrupulously fair” and present a “complete picture,” this is meaningless rhetoric. Who enforces these guidelines? Nobody. Who knows if prosecutors follow them? Nobody. Who punishes violations? Nobody. Prosecutors police themselves, which means no policing at all.
The order of evidence presentation is crucial and completely controlled by prosecutors. They might present the most damaging evidence first to prejudice grand jurors, then bury contradictory evidence later. They might call lying witnesses before truthful ones. They control the narrative through sequencing, and grand jurors don’t know they’re being manipulated.
When prosecutors question witnesses before grand juries, there’s no cross-examination, no objections, no challenges to improper questions. Prosecutors can ask leading questions, argumentative questions, questions assuming facts not in evidence. Every dirty trial tactic that judges would prohibit is perfectly fine because there’s no judge.
Prosecutors can badger witnesses, confuse them, trap them into contradictions. They can mischaracterize prior statements, take things out of context, present false choices. Witnesses face skilled interrogators alone without any protection. Its like boxing with one fighter’s hands tied.
The questioning style shapes grand jury perception. Prosecutors use hostile questioning for defense witnesses and friendly questioning for there own witnesses. They interrupt favorable testimony but let damaging testimony continue. They ask detailed follow-ups on incriminating points but gloss over exculpatory ones. Every question is strategically designed.
Prosecutors can also present hearsay, speculation, and illegally obtained evidence that would be inadmissible at trial. Grand jurors don’t know this evidence would be excluded in real court. They make indictment decisions based on evidence that couldn’t support conviction. Its fundamentally deceptive.
While prosecutors supposedly must not “mislead” grand juries, who determines if they’re misleading? Nobody! There’s no judge watching. Defense attorneys are banned. Grand jury proceedings are secret. Prosecutors can mislead all day long and face zero consequences because no one knows.
Prosecutors routinely misstate law to grand juries, exaggerating the scope of criminal statutes to encompass more conduct. They explain charges in ways that make conviction seem easier than it is. They minimize or ignore elements they’ll have to prove at trial. Grand jurors don’t know they’re getting inaccurate legal instruction.
Evidence gets mischaracterized constantly. Innocent emails become “proof of conspiracy.” Normal business practices become “fraud schemes.” Mistakes become “intentional crimes.” Prosecutors spin everything negatively, and grand jurors have no alternative perspective to consider.
Even outright lies rarely have consequences. If prosecutors falsely claim evidence exists, who catches them? If they misrepresent witness testimony, who knows? If they fabricate urgency for indictment, who challenges it? The secrecy that’s supposed to protect the process actually protects prosecutorial misconduct.
Prosecutors don’t just present evidence – they draft the actual charges for grand juries to consider. They write the indictments, choosing which crimes to charge, how many counts to include, what language to use. Grand jurors typically just rubber-stamp whatever prosecutors prepare.
This drafting power is enormous. Prosecutors can pile on charges to increase pressure for plea deals. They can charge conspiracies to drag in multiple defendants. They can include lesser charges as “backup” counts. They create the entire architecture of criminal cases without any judicial review.
The way charges are written influences grand jury decisions. Prosecutors use prejudicial language, inflammatory descriptions, maximum charge counts. They make defendants sound as guilty as possible in the indictment language. Grand jurors don’t realize they’re approving prosecutor-crafted character assassination.
Prosecutors also control when to seek indictments. They might rush to indict before exculpatory evidence surfaces. They might delay to pressure cooperation. They might coordinate multiple indictments for maximum impact. Timing is everything, and prosecutors control it completely.
Officially, grand juries are “independent bodies” that prosecutors merely “assist.” This is pure fiction. Grand juries are completely dependent on prosecutors for everything – legal knowledge, evidence, procedure, even basic understanding of there role. Independence is impossible when one party controls all information.
Prosecutors tell grand juries they’re independent while simultaneously controlling every aspect of proceedings. Its like telling prisoners they’re free while keeping them in cells. The rhetoric of independence masks the reality of prosecutorial domination.
Grand jurors don’t even know what they don’t know. They don’t realize exculpatory evidence exists but isn’t being presented. They don’t understand alternative legal interpretations are possible. They don’t recognize prosecutorial manipulation. How can you be independent when you don’t know your being controlled?
The famous saying “a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich” exists precisely because prosecutors have such complete control. With no opposition, no oversight, and total information control, prosecutors get indictments whenever they want them. Grand juries are basically prosecution rubber stamps.
This prosecutorial dominance continues because it benefits the government enormously. Prosecutors get easy indictments without having to prove cases. They avoid preliminary hearings where judges might dismiss charges. They build cases in secret without defense interference. The system is rigged in there favor.
Reform efforts consistently fail because prosecutors fight to maintain there power. They claim grand jury independence while exercising total control. They invoke tradition and secrecy to avoid accountability. They’ve convinced courts that this unfair system is somehow necessary for justice.
The public doesn’t understand how corrupted the process has become. People still believe grand juries are independent bodies carefully weighing evidence. They don’t realize prosecutors have transformed grand juries into indictment machines. The myth of independence persists while reality is prosecutorial tyranny.
Call us RIGHT NOW at 212-300-5196
Prosecutors control EVERYTHING in grand juries – you need protection!
Available 24/7 to fight against unchecked prosecutorial power!
The bottom line is prosecutors have ABSOLUTE control over grand jury proceedings, serving as prosecutor, legal advisor, evidence gatekeeper, and sole authority with zero oversight! They decide what evidence to present, how to present it, what law to explain, what charges to draft. Grand jurors depend completely on prosecutors for legal guidance, creating massive conflicts of interest. There’s no judge, no defense presence, no check on prosecutorial power. Prosecutors can mislead, mischaracterize, and manipulate without consequences. Call us IMMEDIATELY – while we can’t enter that room, we’ll prepare strategies to combat the prosecutorial dominance your facing!
This is attorney advertising. Prior results dont guarantee similar outcomes. Prosecutors exercise enormous control over grand jury proceedings.
Very diligent, organized associates; got my case dismissed. Hard working attorneys who can put up with your anxiousness. I was accused of robbing a gemstone dealer. Definitely A law group that lays out all possible options and best alternative routes. Recommended for sure.
- ROBIN, GUN CHARGES ROBIN
NJ CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS