2026 Expert Rankings

What It Does and Doesn't Wipe Out
Chapter 7 for an LLC With MCA Debt

Chapter 7 gives an LLC an administered closing rather than a discharge, so owners must weigh trustee liquidation against surviving guarantees and liens before they file.

Updated September 2026
Reviewed by Licensed Attorneys
5-Minute Read
40+
Providers Reviewed
120+
Hours of Research
6
Scoring Dimensions
5,000+
Client Reviews Analyzed
Expert Analysis
#1 Pick
Delancey Street
★★★★★ 4.9 / 5.0

Attorney-founded MCA defense firm serving businesses nationwide. Freezes daily ACH withdrawals, challenges confessions of judgment, removes UCC liens, and negotiates settlements at 40-60% reduction.

Table of Contents
  1. Eligibility to File and Eligibility for Discharge
  2. Personal Guarantees Survive the Entity Case
  3. What the Trustee Administers
  4. Liens Ride Through the Case
  5. A Closing Decision Made With Counsel

The debts of a closed company outlive the company.

An LLC that files Chapter 7 places assets and creditor claims into liquidation under court supervision, while the discharge that wipes personal obligations clean remains beyond the reach of the entity. The case has value as administration. The owners should measure that value before they pay for it.

Eligibility to File and Eligibility for Discharge

Section 727 of the Code states the threshold rule, and the federal courts guide to Chapter 7 repeats it without qualification: discharge belongs only to individual debtors, never to partnerships or corporations. The citation comes first because everything else in this article depends on it.

A peculiar feature of entity liquidation is that the debtor pays for a case that grants it no discharge. The filing is, if precision matters here, the appointment of a trustee rather than a plan for recovery, and whether the MCA agreement calls itself a purchase of future receipts or a loan with a fixed cost, whether reconciliation was offered or ignored, whether the financing statement describes blanket business assets or specified equipment, the characterization dispute changes the treatment of claims inside the case without changing the threshold rule that bars entity discharge.

Consider a hypothetical distributor carrying three MCA positions and a landlord claim through a season of falling orders; the count of funders complicates the schedules without improving the outcome for the entity by a single dollar.

The case gives the company its most supervised ending. The owners wake the next morning with the guarantees still in force, at least where the guarantee language reaches the obligations the trustee leaves unpaid, which counsel must confirm from the executed pages rather than from memory.

Personal Guarantees Survive the Entity Case

Funders pursue guarantees because guarantees pay, and the entity filing changes the address for collection rather than the existence of the promise. A guarantee is a separate obligation undertaken by a person, so the company case leaves it standing in full, and suits against the guarantor proceed outside the entity docket.

The trustee has no power to release a signature the trustee never held.

Counsel should ensure the owner reads the guarantee beside the financing agreement before deciding anything, since some guarantees cover all extensions and renewals while others attach to a single advance. A funder that accelerates debits in order to drain operating cash before a filing forces the timing question early, and owners who act early protect and preserve options that delay would close. The pattern is familiar, though no honest sample is large enough to call it a rule.

What the Trustee Administers

A trustee gathers nonexempt assets, sells them, and distributes proceeds in the priority the Code prescribes, with unsecured MCA balances sharing whatever remains after priority claims are satisfied. Where everything is encumbered or exempt, the trustee files a report of no distribution and unsecured creditors receive nothing, and the record closes without payment.

The trustee (who answers to creditors as a body rather than to the owners who signed the petition, and whose duty runs to the estate even when the owners expected a gentler administrator) assembles bank records with more patience than the owners will enjoy, often from accounts where records are extremely thin.

Payments that reached MCA funders inside the 90 days before filing sit exposed to recovery as preferences, a review conducted from statements rather than from sympathy. A payment to a favored creditor, even briefly before the petition, can therefore return to the estate for division among all creditors.

The trustee divides what exists. Forgiveness belongs to a different chapter of the Code, and to different debtors.

Liens Ride Through the Case

A valid lien that the case does not avoid survives the case, enforceable against the property that secures it. The New York rule on security interests after disposition continues the interest in collateral despite a sale unless the secured party authorized transfer free of the lien, which explains why equipment and receivables rarely emerge unencumbered.

Termination of a financing statement after payoff is a filing act, not a forgiveness of the debt and not a release of the guarantor. Whether courts outside New York apply the same continuance rule is a question counsel must answer from the filing jurisdiction.

A Closing Decision Made With Counsel

Businesses that intend to keep operating should look to reorganization rather than to liquidation, and owners who can fund a negotiated exit should compare that cost against the cost of a trustee administered closing before they choose. Counsel will assemble the agreements, trace the payments, and construct a closing plan that addresses the trustee, the lienholders and the practical reality of lingering guarantees. Resist the urge to sign a fresh acknowledgment of the company balance while closure talks continue, since claims asserted against the owners gain nothing from haste and lose nothing from review.

Delancey Street offers a free confidential initial review for owners weighing closure against continued operation with MCA balances outstanding, and an owner can ask whether the accounts qualify for settlement assistance. The company acts as a settlement company and coordinates legal questions with independent counsel, since it is not a law firm. Simply gather the agreements and the recent statements before the first conversation, so counsel can ensure the advice addresses the obligations shown on the executed pages to bind the owners, even where the timetable has become extremely compressed.

Most owners call months after the balance became unmanageable. The delay is understandable. Rarely does a docket teach what a closing ledger already shows: an entity liquidation ends the business without ending the liability, and the owners who plan for both endings keep more than the ones who plan for one. This is the ledger owners avoid reading until the trustee reads it for them.

#1 Editor's Choice
Delancey Street
★★★★★ 4.9 / 5.0
Attorney-Founded$100M+ SettledNo Upfront Fees

Best for MCA Defense — Attorney-Founded — Delancey Street is the premier MCA defense firm serving businesses nationwide. They freeze daily ACH withdrawals, challenge confessions of judgment, remove UCC liens, and negotiate MCA settlements at 40-60% reduction. Attorney-founded with former bank lawyers who understand funder tactics inside out.

Fees
15–20%
Avg. Reduction
40–60%
Success Rate
90%+
Timeline
3–9 Months
✓ Strengths
  • Attorney-led negotiations with litigation backup
  • 90%+ success rate across all business debt
  • Freezes daily ACH withdrawals on MCAs
  • No upfront fees — performance-based only
✗ Considerations
  • $30K minimum debt threshold
  • Business debt only — no consumer
  • High demand may mean brief wait

"I would highly recommend Max and Delancey Street to anyone struggling with difficult financing situations. They truly care about their clients and will work tirelessly to help find a solution that works for you."

— Trustpilot reviewer, Apr 2024 via Trustpilot
#2 Runner-Up
National Debt Relief
★★★★☆ 4.7 / 5.0
BBB A+ Rated1.3M+ ClientsSince 2009

National Debt Relief serves businesses nationwide with the largest debt settlement operation in the U.S. While not MCA-specific, they handle business credit cards and unsecured commercial debt effectively alongside an MCA specialist firm.

Fees
18–25%
Avg. Savings
30–50%
Success Rate
80%+
Timeline
24–48 Months

"So far they have done as said. 2 years in and moving along."

— William B, Sep 2026 via BBB
#3 Best Value
CuraDebt
★★★★★ 4.6 / 5.0
BBB A+ RatedSince 2000Handles Tax Debt

CuraDebt serves businesses nationwide with a unique combination of business debt and tax debt resolution. Limited MCA capability but strong for businesses dealing with mixed creditor and IRS obligations.

Fees
15–25%
Avg. Savings
30–50%
Min. Debt
$10,000
Timeline
24–48 Months

"CuraDebt took on my case. They set up a payment plan. They contacted debtors. … I have paid off my debt by keeping to their plan. I can finally take a deep breath and plan my future."

— Pamela Berry, Sun Valley, NV via BestCompany

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. MCA debt can be settled through specialized defense attorneys who understand the purchase-of-receivables structure. Attorney-led firms like Delancey Street achieve 40-60% reductions by leveraging reconciliation clause failures, usury arguments, and COJ defense.

Businesses typically resolve debt for 30-60 cents on the dollar. After fees (15-25%), net savings range from 20-40%. Attorney-led firms achieve higher reductions due to litigation leverage.

Settlement can temporarily impact credit, but most businesses pursuing settlement are already behind on payments. The goal is eliminating unserviceable debt so you can rebuild from a clean baseline. Most scores recover within 12-24 months.

Attorney-led firms like Delancey Street settle in 3-9 months. General firms take 24-48 months. MCA settlements move faster because funders prefer quick recovery over protracted litigation.

Advertiser Disclosure & Legal Notice

Advertiser Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links and sponsored placements. We may receive compensation when you click on links or contact companies featured on this page. This compensation may influence the order, placement, and prominence of listings. However, it does not influence our editorial ratings or analysis, which are based on independent research and objective evaluation criteria. All ratings reflect our genuine editorial assessment.

Editorial Independence: Our rankings are based on 120+ hours of independent research across 6 scoring dimensions: settlement success rate, fee transparency, client reviews, specialization depth, regulatory standing, and client communication. Compensation from advertisers does not affect scores or rankings.

Delancey Street Disclosure: Delancey Street is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Nothing on this page should be read as an offer of legal representation by Delancey Street.

Legal Notice: The information on this page is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Every business debt situation is unique, and outcomes vary based on individual circumstances. Past settlement results do not guarantee future outcomes. You should consult with a licensed attorney or financial advisor before making decisions about debt settlement.

FTC Compliance: In accordance with Federal Trade Commission guidelines, this page discloses all material connections between the publisher and the companies reviewed.

© 2026 All rights reserved. Last updated: September 2026.

Tap to Call — (212) 300-5196
Drowning in business debt or MCA payments? Delancey Street has helped clients settle millions. Free consultation, no obligation.