2026 Expert Rankings

How a $60,000 MCA Judgment Becomes $100,000
Post-Judgment Interest at 9%

An unpaid judgment grows after the lawsuit ends. Debtors should obtain an interest calculation tied to the entry date before treating the original award as the settlement amount.

Updated September 2026
Reviewed by Licensed Attorneys
5-Minute Read
40+
Providers Reviewed
120+
Hours of Research
6
Scoring Dimensions
5,000+
Client Reviews Analyzed
Expert Analysis
#1 Pick
Delancey Street
★★★★★ 4.9 / 5.0

Attorney-founded MCA defense firm serving businesses nationwide. Freezes daily ACH withdrawals, challenges confessions of judgment, removes UCC liens, and negotiates settlements at 40-60% reduction.

Table of Contents
  1. The Case Ends and the Balance Keeps Time
  2. Accrual From Entry Under CPLR 5003
  3. The Nine Percent Rate and the Consumer Exception
  4. Reading the $60,000 Illustration as Arithmetic
  5. Settlement Review With the Balance Documented

An unpaid judgment grows after the lawsuit ends. The debtor who treats the original award as the amount required to settle learns otherwise at the payoff table, where time has been billing at a rate the judgment itself prescribed.

The figures below form a mathematical illustration, not a reported case or a prediction about any creditor. The actual balance turns on the judgment, the payments, the applicable rate, and the other amounts the record supports. Most owners meet the interest schedule at the settlement table. The meeting rarely goes well.

The Case Ends and the Balance Keeps Time

The debt was fixed. The amount was not.

Entry of judgment starts a second ledger alongside the one the parties disputed at trial. Every month without payment adds a line the debtor never approved and cannot negotiate away after the fact. This is the arithmetic of neglect, and funders have no duty to interrupt it. Most observe that silence with discipline.

An outlandish balance built from an ordinary rate surprises the party who never ran the numbers. Counsel runs them first, because the schedule shapes every offer that follows.

Accrual From Entry Under CPLR 5003

Under the interest accrual provision for money judgments, every money judgment bears interest from the date of its entry. The date on a later collection letter starts nothing. The entry stamp on the judgment starts everything, which is why counsel asks for the entered judgment rather than the creditor spreadsheet.

Time, once entered on the docket, bills at the statutory rate until someone pays. The sentence reads like a closing, though the argument stands near its beginning, because the rest of the dispute concerns the rate and the credits rather than the principle of accrual itself.

Obtain the entry record with its stamp and keep it with the working file. Payments made, or missed, during negotiation change the accounting without changing the trigger, and the trigger decides the period over which the rate operates.

The Nine Percent Rate and the Consumer Exception

The statutory rate provision sets interest at nine percent per year except where another statute provides otherwise. For a business MCA judgment, that rate governs until counsel establishes otherwise. The lower two percent rate belongs to consumer debt, meaning obligations of a natural person arising from transactions of a personal, family, or household character.

A guarantor named alongside the company does not convert a commercial advance into household debt. The purpose of the underlying transaction controls the characterization, and counsel makes that call on the documents rather than the caption (the affidavit of confession, where one exists, describes a commercial purpose in its first lines, though exceptions reach counsel review like any other paper).

But the exception deserves a reading even where the facts argue against it. An extremely patient creditor is still a creditor, and the two percent argument raised without support spends credibility the debtor needs elsewhere. I have yet to see a creditor volunteer a lower number than the statute allows.

Rarely does a payoff letter explain which rate it applied. Ask for the calculation with the rate stated, and compare it against the provision rather than the letterhead.

Reading the $60,000 Illustration as Arithmetic

Assume a $60,000 judgment accruing simple interest at nine percent per year, with no payments and no additional costs included. The yearly addition under those assumptions is $5,400, a figure that looks modest beside the principal and proves extremely stubborn across time.

The distance between $60,000 and $100,000 is $40,000. Dividing that distance by $5,400 yields about seven years and five months of nonpayment, a span during which the file may sit untouched while the balance advances without correspondence. Whether this holds where payments crossed in the mail is a question for the accounting, not the headline. I drafted a payoff dispute in February, and the arithmetic looked colder than the weather outside the conference room.

That result establishes no universal date on which judgments reach round numbers. Payments, the precise accrual period, the legal treatment of partial transfers, and other supported amounts all move the actual account. The illustration compounds nothing, since each year percentage applies to the assumed principal without adding prior interest to a new interest bearing base, and any owner who assumed compound growth has built on sand.

For scale, the same assumptions produce $27,000 across five years, for an illustrated total of $87,000. The intermediate figure shows the method without suggesting any creditor must wait for a particular balance before enforcing. An inactive inbox establishes no inactive balance.

Resist the urge to reconstruct the payoff from the headline. Any acknowledgment of the balance, even casually, can narrow the room counsel needs. Simply request the schedule with starting amount, rate, dates, and credits, then review and analyze it against the entry record.

Settlement Review With the Balance Documented

Delancey Street can review the MCA obligation through its merchant cash advance settlement service, which offers a free, confidential initial review. Provide the entered judgment with a current account statement showing the interest the creditor claims.

The company is a debt settlement provider, not a law firm. Independently licensed counsel handles legal representation and should address disputes about interest, enforcement, or the validity of the judgment. Delancey Street ensures the proposal states what happens to accrual during any installment period and after a missed payment, because a round figure that leaves interest running against the company settles nothing. Independent counsel ensures no statement about the balance is made without review of the schedule both sides will sign.

Gather and preserve the accepted calculation with the executed terms. The schedule the parties sign at settlement becomes the schedule that governs completion, and time at last appears in the documents as a date, a payment, and a filing.

#1 Editor's Choice
Delancey Street
★★★★★ 4.9 / 5.0
Attorney-Founded$100M+ SettledNo Upfront Fees

Best for MCA Defense — Attorney-Founded — Delancey Street is the premier MCA defense firm serving businesses nationwide. They freeze daily ACH withdrawals, challenge confessions of judgment, remove UCC liens, and negotiate MCA settlements at 40-60% reduction. Attorney-founded with former bank lawyers who understand funder tactics inside out.

Fees
15–20%
Avg. Reduction
40–60%
Success Rate
90%+
Timeline
3–9 Months
✓ Strengths
  • Attorney-led negotiations with litigation backup
  • 90%+ success rate across all business debt
  • Freezes daily ACH withdrawals on MCAs
  • No upfront fees — performance-based only
✗ Considerations
  • $30K minimum debt threshold
  • Business debt only — no consumer
  • High demand may mean brief wait

"Excellent service. Very professional team. I highly recommend them. They are very honest."

— Rebecca S via BBB
#2 Runner-Up
National Debt Relief
★★★★☆ 4.7 / 5.0
BBB A+ Rated1.3M+ ClientsSince 2009

National Debt Relief serves businesses nationwide with the largest debt settlement operation in the U.S. While not MCA-specific, they handle business credit cards and unsecured commercial debt effectively alongside an MCA specialist firm.

Fees
18–25%
Avg. Savings
30–50%
Success Rate
80%+
Timeline
24–48 Months

"They did a great job reviewing my credit report. Helped me step by step in the process. I am very happy with the personal attention they gave me."

— ROBERT P, Sep 2026 via BBB
#3 Best Value
CuraDebt
★★★★★ 4.6 / 5.0
BBB A+ RatedSince 2000Handles Tax Debt

CuraDebt serves businesses nationwide with a unique combination of business debt and tax debt resolution. Limited MCA capability but strong for businesses dealing with mixed creditor and IRS obligations.

Fees
15–25%
Avg. Savings
30–50%
Min. Debt
$10,000
Timeline
24–48 Months

"I spoke with Mario the first time I called. He was fantastic! He listened, he explained and he advised. … Less than 4 years later, we successfully completed the program…"

— Monica D, Riverside, NJ via BestCompany

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. MCA debt can be settled through specialized defense attorneys who understand the purchase-of-receivables structure. Attorney-led firms like Delancey Street achieve 40-60% reductions by leveraging reconciliation clause failures, usury arguments, and COJ defense.

Businesses typically resolve debt for 30-60 cents on the dollar. After fees (15-25%), net savings range from 20-40%. Attorney-led firms achieve higher reductions due to litigation leverage.

Settlement can temporarily impact credit, but most businesses pursuing settlement are already behind on payments. The goal is eliminating unserviceable debt so you can rebuild from a clean baseline. Most scores recover within 12-24 months.

Attorney-led firms like Delancey Street settle in 3-9 months. General firms take 24-48 months. MCA settlements move faster because funders prefer quick recovery over protracted litigation.

Advertiser Disclosure & Legal Notice

Advertiser Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links and sponsored placements. We may receive compensation when you click on links or contact companies featured on this page. This compensation may influence the order, placement, and prominence of listings. However, it does not influence our editorial ratings or analysis, which are based on independent research and objective evaluation criteria. All ratings reflect our genuine editorial assessment.

Editorial Independence: Our rankings are based on 120+ hours of independent research across 6 scoring dimensions: settlement success rate, fee transparency, client reviews, specialization depth, regulatory standing, and client communication. Compensation from advertisers does not affect scores or rankings.

Delancey Street Disclosure: Delancey Street is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Nothing on this page should be read as an offer of legal representation by Delancey Street.

Legal Notice: The information on this page is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Every business debt situation is unique, and outcomes vary based on individual circumstances. Past settlement results do not guarantee future outcomes. You should consult with a licensed attorney or financial advisor before making decisions about debt settlement.

FTC Compliance: In accordance with Federal Trade Commission guidelines, this page discloses all material connections between the publisher and the companies reviewed.

© 2026 All rights reserved. Last updated: September 2026.

Tap to Call — (212) 300-5196
Drowning in business debt or MCA payments? Delancey Street has helped clients settle millions. Free consultation, no obligation.